Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<atropos-C06679.16281423052024@news.giganews.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!local-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 23:18:48 +0000 From: BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: [OT] German politician successfully prosecuted for telling the truth References: <20240522125702.0000756a@example.com> <atropos-BDF086.11381623052024@news.giganews.com> <v2o7bi$1tkcc$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-DCEA6D.13351123052024@news.giganews.com> <v2ohni$1v2sq$2@dont-email.me> User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b3 (Intel Mac OS X) Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 16:28:14 -0700 Message-ID: <atropos-C06679.16281423052024@news.giganews.com> Lines: 52 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-PrDBKvAceH9Yki5ZM5jCzlh/DkqyHUVZGnOnPezfGKYzgyE+a/4TYPqKCtm2xgEExml52/6OtiVVEzs!hZNj0u9UTvoeKVbKNTK1yG0M+E+D2ZtBWFmSf9u6qe408WVV6SlGn5IlZ0luAxT3XxY1rguuc/xV!F9w= X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 3262 In article <v2ohni$1v2sq$2@dont-email.me>, "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote: > BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote: > >moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: > >>5/23/2024 2:38 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > >>>moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: > >>>>On 5/22/2024 12:57 PM, Rhino wrote: > > >>>>>Once again, Leo Kearse hits it out of the park: > > >>>>>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d5uW1Htq7XU [10 minutes] > > >>>>I listened to enough to hear the claim that truth is a defense > >>>>against a charge of "incitement to hatred" ...which, obviously, > >>>>it isn't. > > >>>As I said, the truth is now illegal. > > >>>But neither should citing the government's own crime statistics in a > >>>discussion about public policy be considered "incitement to hatred" > >>>merely because it undermines the government's immigration agenda. > > >>As I said, an "incitement to hatred" needn't carry any lie. > > >And expanding on what I said, if you make truth illegal because you've > >created circumstances that allow you to claim it leads to some nebulous > >concept of 'hatred', then you've successfully muzzled all political > >opposition and have created a dictatorial society where anyone who > >speaks against you is criminalized. > > >And this all comes from the people who are constantly bleating about the > >need to "protect muh democracy!" > > Political opposition? It's far worse than what you've stated. > > The justice researchers and analysts who compiled the statistics then > reported their finding are every bit as guilty of "incitement to hatred" > as the politician. > > What about the police who made arrests who are required by law to report > ethnic and national characteristics of the perpetrator and victim? By > complying with their duty to observe and report, they too have run afoul > of the law. > > How about a witness who desribed the perpetrator? Guilty. > > How about the victim or complaining witness? Guilty. > > How about the newspaper that discussed justice statistics? Guilty. And this is a moviePig approved society.