Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 May 2024 22:07:50 +0000
From: BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: [OT] Professor inflitrates pro-Palestinian encampment; union leader calls for consequences
References: <20240505204412.000020d9@example.com> <C_qcnc-c3Iuvp6X7nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com> <20240505232212.000020e2@example.com> <atropos-AF42F4.21582505052024@news.giganews.com> <P71_N.97223$lwqa.22972@fx18.iad> <atropos-ECEC31.12244506052024@news.giganews.com> <v1dfss$3af7n$4@dont-email.me> <atropos-860DE3.12394107052024@news.giganews.com> <v1e117$3ej1v$2@dont-email.me> <atropos-EB37DD.13305807052024@news.giganews.com> <v1ip5q$niq5$1@dont-email.me> <jh7r3jd2f79istse123vde6n9jvqvkdb1f@4ax.com> <Gxqdnb5n5bqZPKD7nZ2dnZfqn_QAAAAA@giganews.com> <v1l7v7$1ck52$1@dont-email.me> <HWGdnaITltFewqP7nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com> <v1lpp9$1gnv5$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b3 (Intel Mac OS X)
Date: Sun, 12 May 2024 15:16:51 -0700
Message-ID: <atropos-C514B8.15165012052024@news.giganews.com>
Lines: 18
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-HQAx2k5iqjVZvC/7VBzWyrTRHBSt+LGTTfwc7vGSPCiDhFCfJytK9y+0mJj5cOfGlTRM/3+1ckaJKnZ!CCE1X7WkK1gMNqsAHxqiBHa/fVEF9eZM2sVXk84uhEF00NmPG/L5MbHiJUHU/Lyial2oyYrJ2qha!WAM=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 2391

In article <v1lpp9$1gnv5$1@dont-email.me>,
 moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

> On 5/10/2024 1:56 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

> > And now the Scarf Lady, Dr. Deborah Birx, says that thousands of Americans
> > could be injured from the mRNA Wuhan Flu shot and that some groups should
> > not have been forced to get the jab.
> > 
> > Weird how she wasn't saying that when Biden's decree was "take the shot or
> > you're fired" in the federal government. Back then, she and your vaunted
> > 'fact checkers' would only repeat the mantra that it's 'safe and
> > effective'.
> 
> You mean it *shouldn't* have been called safe and effective?...

Ask the people who were injured from the jab whether they think the 
government should have told them it was safe.