Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<atropos-CD97EC.15524525062024@news.giganews.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 22:55:08 +0000
From: BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Criminal Records Expunged for St. Louis Gun Couple
References: <v4t2ai$1imbc$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-1CD7DC.18410418062024@news.giganews.com> <v4uvta$21spc$2@dont-email.me> <atropos-DE6AC6.09273119062024@news.giganews.com> <v4v8ug$23o16$2@dont-email.me> <atropos-542467.12091619062024@news.giganews.com> <v52l9a$2qv7o$10@dont-email.me> <atropos-597F57.18352820062024@news.giganews.com> <v52ngo$2v630$8@dont-email.me> <atropos-77F41E.19244320062024@news.giganews.com> <v55fgb$3ir36$1@dont-email.me> <4enc7jp80vbphg0hc5iociurasnko1obk0@4ax.com> <v57ep4$3u7ea$2@dont-email.me> <atropos-5F134F.12520025062024@news.giganews.com> <v5ffk0$1ns3d$8@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b3 (Intel Mac OS X)
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 15:52:45 -0700
Message-ID: <atropos-CD97EC.15524525062024@news.giganews.com>
Lines: 61
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-VLQ30Q6X3xmutZDnwm14CBsFTPn4QpC/pgza4eO0XkpIzYdJHL6RxaWCJoTPCcjCykvSOCYzmtA8T8R!/zvUkqCkfjMaYkcZ9UvgVhUJgZtAUqSZgldsC5tDT5PyWMHKDRlH/ldxBtYXUQJojRh9BIibfyOo!BLY=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 4299

In article <v5ffk0$1ns3d$8@dont-email.me>,
 moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

> On 6/25/2024 3:52 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> > In article <v57ep4$3u7ea$2@dont-email.me>,
> >   moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> On 6/22/2024 1:20 AM, The Horny Goat wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 23:13:14 -0400, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>> But we don't care about the law as written, remember? It's only the
> >>>>> spirit we should be concerned with. And the spirit of private property
> >>>>> laws certainly does allow for warning off mobs of people in the middle
> >>>>> of nationwide violent riots from trespassing on your land and doing you
> >>>>> harm.
> >>>>
> >>>> Even if that were (absurdly) the "spirit" of private property, there are
> >>>> other laws, including common-sense ones, whose "spirit" figures in, too.
> >>>
> >>> Nevertheless there are few cases in law where a warning to the bad
> >>> guys is required. One of the key points in the Bouchie case was that
> >>> in was on a farm a minimum of 1/2 hour from the nearest police station
> >>> and where 4 drunken people came onto his farm, one attempting to get
> >>> into the farmer's locked truck.
> >>>
> >>> In such situations (particularly with no immediate expectation of
> >>> police attendance) I'm going to err on the side of the homeowner - and
> >>> I wouldn't impose any further burden on the homeowner because he had
> >>> reason to believe one or more of the 4 people in their truck was
> >>> inebriated or of a different ethnicity.
> >>>
> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killing_of_Colten_Boushie
> >>>
> >>> This particular verdict got roughly the same reaction as the OJ
> >>> Simpson case but on a smaller scale and I guarantee Rhino would
> >>> remember it.
> >>
> >> Here's an instructive (but fictional) example:
> >>
> >>      The trespasser steps off the sidewalk and sits down on your lawn.
> >>
> >>      You brandish your gun, saying, "Get off my lawn or I'll shoot."
> >>
> >>      He yawns and remains seated.
> >>
> >>      Comic-book fantasies aside, what do you do?
> > 
> > That's why you don't threaten deadly force unless you're willing to use
> > it.
> > 
> > However that's a separate issue from whether just holding a gun as a
> > screaming unruly mob-- which is already trespassing by its mere
> > presence-- marches up the street toward you in the middle of a
> > nationwide paroxysm of violence to which the police seem unwilling or
> > unable to stand in opposition is, or ought to be, a criminal act.
> 
> In the circumstances you yourself paint, there's obviously no such thing 
> as "*JUST* holding a gun".

Were the rooftop Koreans during the Rodney King riots criminals?