Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<atropos-D28642.12221631052024@news.giganews.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!local-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 19:13:16 +0000
From: BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: What Did You Watch? 2015-07-05 (Sunday)
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b3 (Intel Mac OS X)
Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 12:22:16 -0700
Message-ID: <atropos-D28642.12221631052024@news.giganews.com>
Lines: 35
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-HIP2RXTEjRsIQVTjcZe5FZLdNc7smtorgeHU9VrqLkus6i2t74cbn8rhga1gYWsPERBCWhXQaKDb1SC!byHizqamPDW65nwqtaDZaZT2KduJRFyLwC65JZMGwpyPU0rkpdjFrclxXHOjH3eI6NV6zfxpKNhd!qno=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 2330

In article <atropos-A6FE3E.20455107072015@news.giganews.com> BTR1701 
<atropos@mac.com> wrote:

> In article <9m1ppad1e6drboiv7sr7o2lpu34ed1rs95@4ax.com>,
>  Hunter <<buffhunter@my-deja.com>> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 6 Jul 2015 09:03:19 -0400, Obveeus <Obveeus@aol.com> wrote:
> > 
> > >On 7/6/2015 4:30 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:
> > >
> > >> What did you watch?
> > >
> > >HUMANS: The leader of the 'alive' robots is indeed himself a robot. 
> > >The government healthcare system has been rewriting the rules of robot 
> > >servitude such that the robots can force uncooperative patients to 
> > >follow medical orders.
> > ----
> > That's the National Health Service for you (its a real British
> > government department)! 
> > >
> > > Prostitute robot draws the line at pretend kiddy porn... making
> > > her the second 'alive' robot that has motherly instincts.
> > ----
> > I don't think you have to have motherly instincts to be appalled at
> > child porn. That said maybe that is how one can channel a child
> > molester's drives.
> 
> I wonder if it would be illegal for kiddie diddlers to make/use a 
> child-sized synth for their proclivities?

Well, I guess this question has been definitively answered. This is a 
Kentucky law but it has a federal equivalent as well.

https://kentuckylantern.com/briefs/knowingly-owning-child-sex-dolls-one-s
tep-closer-to-being-a-felony-in-kentucky/