Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 22:00:28 +0000
From: BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Criminal Records Expunged for St. Louis Gun Couple
References: <v4t2ai$1imbc$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-1CD7DC.18410418062024@news.giganews.com> <v4uvta$21spc$2@dont-email.me> <atropos-DE6AC6.09273119062024@news.giganews.com> <v4v8ug$23o16$2@dont-email.me> <atropos-542467.12091619062024@news.giganews.com> <v52l9a$2qv7o$10@dont-email.me> <atropos-597F57.18352820062024@news.giganews.com> <v52ngo$2v630$8@dont-email.me> <atropos-77F41E.19244320062024@news.giganews.com> <v55fgb$3ir36$1@dont-email.me> <4enc7jp80vbphg0hc5iociurasnko1obk0@4ax.com> <v57ep4$3u7ea$2@dont-email.me> <atropos-5F134F.12520025062024@news.giganews.com> <v5ffk0$1ns3d$8@dont-email.me> <atropos-CD97EC.15524525062024@news.giganews.com> <v5fvh9$1uphg$4@dont-email.me> <atropos-259949.20132725062024@news.giganews.com> <v5huvd$2aohk$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-A87252.14045026062024@news.giganews.com> <v5i28t$2b8qj$3@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b3 (Intel Mac OS X)
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 14:58:02 -0700
Message-ID: <atropos-EBFEB6.14580226062024@news.giganews.com>
Lines: 40
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-o9XYxZdqi88+wzaRQKlW1QKMA1y8/SbZdKOIN3kn6o7V5TIhVOs7TbPBHVZYMowifD1rYOWsNJs2fkW!D4MN0xi6Gf0uSF65jrERJsa6Viaub9iVZVULfefJB3XW4b0ye5No6I68ZuUCQMBNs5wwM5prvXhI!0R8=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 3328

In article <v5i28t$2b8qj$3@dont-email.me>,
 moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

> On 6/26/2024 5:04 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> > In article <v5huvd$2aohk$1@dont-email.me>,
> >   moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> On 6/25/2024 11:13 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>> In article <v5fvh9$1uphg$4@dont-email.me>,
> >>>    moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

> >>>>>> In the circumstances you yourself paint, there's obviously no such 
> >>>>>> thing as "*JUST* holding a gun".
> >>>>
> >>>>> Were the rooftop Koreans during the Rodney King riots criminals?
> >>>>
> >>>> I don't remember what you're talking about ...but possibly they were
> >>>> threatening deadly force.
> >>>
> >>> Google it.
> >>>
> >>> Theirs were among the only stores in those neighborhoods not looted
> >>> and/or burned, so apparently whatever they were threatening, it was
> >>> justified.
> >>
> >> Many obscenely wrong measures can be effective without being justified.
> > 
> > So they should have just let their property and livelihoods be destroyed
> > to protect the poor wittle rioters from feeling skeered?
> > 
> > What exactly is "obscenely wrong" about arming yourself in the middle of
> > a violent riot and defending yourself and your property?
> > 
> > Why are you always on the side of the shitbags of this world?
> 
> I'm not on anyone's "side"

And yet your objections always seem to favor the side of the shitbag. 
Like here, where you call perfectly reasonable and morally justifiable 
actions of self-defense "obscenely wrong".