Path: Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 02:50:35 +0000
From: BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: [OT] Professor inflitrates pro-Palestinian encampment; union leader calls for consequences
References: <20240505204412.000020d9@example.com> <v1lpp9$1gnv5$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-C514B8.15165012052024@news.giganews.com> <v1rhbi$31ea6$1@dont-email.me> <pAadnbLSD9TW19z7nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com> <v1rtuq$37l07$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b3 (Intel Mac OS X)
Date: Sun, 12 May 2024 19:59:36 -0700
Message-ID: <atropos-F73D18.19593612052024@news.giganews.com>
Lines: 39
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-MNWpcd2AsWC36UKCVrg080+cJKSJhF/wnbM/BYdPWlMo2A4tespkPKGY9x9ArF+Z7UiZEsXRI/YSuLM!pu8AhJX2VgiqufyOhmLdGXPAaTyQBzC6HfSlp+2/LxT/15srZW//eQEcE3BOaQdm+9FJISdmkrxi!5uA=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 2895

In article <v1rtuq$37l07$1@dont-email.me>,
 moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

> On 5/12/2024 7:01 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> > On May 12, 2024 at 3:54:42 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> On 5/12/2024 6:16 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>>   In article <v1lpp9$1gnv5$1@dont-email.me>,
> >>>     moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> >>>   
> >>>>   On 5/10/2024 1:56 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>>   
> >>>>> And now the Scarf Lady, Dr. Deborah Birx, says that thousands of 
> >>>>> Americans could be injured from the mRNA Wuhan Flu shot and that
> >>>>> some groups should not have been forced to get the jab.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Weird how she wasn't saying that when Biden's decree was "take the 
> >>>>> shot or you're fired" in the federal government. Back then, she
> >>>>> and your vaunted 'fact checkers' would only repeat the mantra that
> >>>>> it's 'safe and effective'.
> >>>>
> >>>> You mean it *shouldn't* have been called safe and effective?...
> >>>   
> >>> Ask the people who were injured from the jab whether they think the
> >>> government should have told them it was safe.
> >>
> >> I'm asking what a responsible public health official ought to have said.
> > 
> > How about the truth?
> 
> The truth is that every medical procedure *including NO procedure* 
> carries some risk.

And an ethical medical professional explains the type and extent of that 
risk, as well as its frequency of occurrence in the population.

They don't ignore the risk and just tell you "it's safe and effective". 
(And don't forget the denigration and censorship of anyone who suggested 
otherwise, who have yet again turned out to be right in the end.)