Path: Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 17:34:28 +0000
From: BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Ketanji Jackson Worried That the 1st Amendment is Hamstringing Government Censorship
References: <AbGcneZpLeuJ12f4nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com> <17bee95657459db9$30487$1351842$40d50a60@news.newsdemon.com> <atropos-E26190.16174621032024@news.giganews.com> <utjpbj$2srhl$1@dont-email.me> <Crmcnc_SKN28dWD4nZ2dnZfqn_YAAAAA@giganews.com> <utmroa$3n3jl$2@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b3 (Intel Mac OS X)
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 10:42:04 -0700
Message-ID: <atropos-FD799E.10420423032024@news.giganews.com>
Lines: 46
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-EO3XDyP5iaxhjsq0BXhxuKQHKCR9BUeELQxDvhp3gA44DisnhX/lavgnou9gwCJJ8HlWdDqHJhEz14Y!rMPSQ9u8TI0C/kW6/cx0y3p3Y7zF5dtjNOwuNnE/JNMBdndpeRlNGZb2D60E5iQMeNwv+naSxrW3!UOk=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 3078

In article <utmroa$3n3jl$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> 
wrote:

> On 3/22/24 4:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> > On Mar 22, 2024 at 4:17:05 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> On 3/21/24 7:17 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>>   In article
> >>>   <17bee95657459db9$30487$1351842$40d50a60@news.newsdemon.com>,
> >>>     moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:

> >>>> Seems you're now arguing for freedom of the press, as if anyone in 
> >>>> this dialogue has ever disputed it.
> >>>   
> >>> Effa disputed it: "Or try publishing National Defense secrets..."
> >>>   
> >>>> Not many Usenet points for that...
> >>>   
> >>> Points restored.
> >>
> >> Thanny isn't a journalist.
> > 
> > Don't need to be. I'm still protected under the 1st Amendment. Nowhere does
> > the 1st Amendment limit press protection to only people who work for big
> > legacy corporations. Indeed, the Supreme Court has ruled that citizen 
> > media-- bloggers, YouTubers, individual citizens commenting on websites--
> > all fall under the 1st Amendment's press protections.
> > 
> >> The Espionage Act
> >> National defense information in general is protected by the Espionage
> >> Act,21 18 U.S.C. §§ 793­ 798
> > 
> > New York Times Co. v. United States, 403 U.S. 713 (1971)
> > 
> > Any elements of the Act that conflict with the Supreme Court's decision in 
> > NY Times v U.S. are superseded by it.
> > 
> > That's how this shit works. You know, the Supreme Court decides whether
> > statutes or parts of statutes are constitutional or not. This is something
> > grade schoolers know but our resident amateur historian apparently needs
> > explained to him.
> 
> Just no.

Just yes. Effa now denies there's such a thing as Judicial Review. I 
guess Marbury vs Madison was a recipe for oatmeal or something.