Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<atropos-FE9D89.18165520062024@news.giganews.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 01:19:37 +0000
From: BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Kamala Outright Lies About Women's Basketball Brackets
References: <17d4370a814a9fe0$40$3919488$c2d58868@news.newsdemon.com> <v41t67$2lmr3$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-E21869.11080908062024@news.giganews.com> <v46nc1$dg7s$1@dont-email.me> <HcKdnbn3yKP9rvr7nZ2dnZfqnPgAAAAA@giganews.com> <v4rvqd$1brlu$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-ACE440.13421918062024@news.giganews.com> <v52jb5$2qnl3$3@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b3 (Intel Mac OS X)
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 18:16:55 -0700
Message-ID: <atropos-FE9D89.18165520062024@news.giganews.com>
Lines: 117
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-hhdnHgDVTm0ML1UeBDN63jE8fWvuCERTXiQwWm2kLxGBFw4UnZHhodPiK7qjeDYL+Xf5Ap7aFrXLY8J!NlO2yvGoNlZW7O4zW2Xary4URKppJ7bd8WdC0REgINEXxuBI4b5MqYcuIJwvJpJp5wtPNn7jd5Jo!1uc=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 6456

In article <v52jb5$2qnl3$3@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> 
wrote:

> On 6/18/24 4:42 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> > In article <v4rvqd$1brlu$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > 
> >> On 6/10/24 1:09 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>> On Jun 10, 2024 at 4:17:21 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 6/8/24 2:08 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>>>> In article <v41t67$2lmr3$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>    
> >>>>>> On 6/7/24 3:18 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <v3uven$22nu4$4@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 6/4/24 5:28 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On Jun 4, 2024 at 8:35:23 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 6/3/24 10:43 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> In article <v3lkv6$3jgk$1@dont-email.me>, FPP
> >>>>>>>>>>> <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>        
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/3/24 1:06 PM, shawn wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> They don't really need any ankle bracelets since he's got the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Secret Service protection. Plus he's not likely to skip the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> country. Most likely he would get home confinement to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Mar-A-Largo which isn't really home confinement. Other than
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> his inability to travel to do rallys. It's not like being
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> confined to a 2 bedroom home.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Who says? You?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Why aren't ankle bracelets needed? Is he special? Does the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> convict get to choose his jailers now?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Why Mar-a-Lago? Why not Trump Tower? He committed the crime in
> >>>>>>>>>>>> New York. He was indicted and convicted in New York. Why
> >>>>>>>>>>>> shouldn't he serve his sentence in (wait for it) New York?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Who gets to pick? The convict? Is this what your legal instincts
> >>>>>>>>>>>> tell you? Or are you just bullshitting in favor or your Dear
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Leader again?
> >>>>>>>>>>>        
> >>>>>>>>>>> FYI- You're responding to Shawn-- who's generally sympathetic to
> >>>>>>>>>>> Dems and on your side-- not me, you dumb fucktard. Look at the
> >>>>>>>>>>> attributions from now on before going full froth.
> >>>>>>>>>>>        
> >>>>>>>>>> Sorry shawn... I had my bedtime eye ointment in, and must have
> >>>>>>>>>> missed the attribution.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Strike the last paragraph. The others are still relevant, though.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Thanny: "Is this what your legal instincts tell you?
> >>>>>>>>>> Or are you just bullshitting in favor or your Dear Leader again?"
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> That's for YOU.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Up to this point, I haven't commented on Trump's method of 
> >>>>>>>>> punishment AT ALL, so other than directly out of your ass, I
> >>>>>>>>> have no idea where you're getting the "Or are you just
> >>>>>>>>> bullshitting in favor or your Dear Leader again?" and assigning
> >>>>>>>>> it to me.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> You almost never comment on Dear Leader, do you?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Nice attempt at deflection but no one's falling for it.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Since I never commented on Trump's method of punishment AT ALL, where
> >>>>>>> are you getting "Or are you just bullshitting in favor or your Dear
> >>>>>>> Leader again?", other than out of your ass?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Remember, you've specifically directed that question to me now, so
> >>>>>>> you can't pawn it off as a mistake or because your herpes eye unguent
> >>>>>>> confused you.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> And you think NOT commenting on a convicted felon and adjudicated
> >>>>>> rapist and fraud says something good about you?
> >>>>>    
> >>>>> Irrelevant. You claimed I did comment, so Mr. I-Never-Post-Something-
> >>>>> Without-Proof has painted himself into a corner yet again.
> >>>>>    
> >>>> Not at all.
> >>>
> >>> So post the proof. Show me where I commented on Trump's potential
> >>> sentencing details. Betcha won't because you can't.
> > 
> >> You never mention Trump. That's the point.
> > 
> > And yet you claimed I did comment on Trump.
> > 
> > So that would be... wait for it... a lie.
> > 
> Got me there, klown!  I'm done for now...

At least you admitted it. Of course that also makes all the other times 
you said you never  lie a... wait for it... also a lie.
> 
> > "Always" and "Never" statements are frequently used by people when they
> > are arguing in order to emphasize or illustrate the merits of their
> > position.

Oh, so now colloquialisms are okay again? Weird how we're never allowed 
to stray from the literal unless it's necessary to get Effa out of a jam.

Of course even granting hyperbole for the sake of an Effa win on Usenet 
today, that *still* doesn't get you out of this jam:

"Or are you just bullshitting in favor or your Dear Leader again?"

In which you reference alleged statements on Trump's sentencing that I 
never made. No amount of pretend appeals to hyperbole are gonna get you 
out of this lie, Effa.