| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<attribution-20240227165431@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From: ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: getOpsFromSelf() (Long Post)
Date: 27 Feb 2024 15:55:58 GMT
Organization: Stefan Ram
Lines: 10
Expires: 1 Feb 2025 11:59:58 GMT
Message-ID: <attribution-20240227165431@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
References: <ur1ie5$2cgfo$1@dont-email.me> <jh8EdBXIFQu4WLaKt@bongo-ra.co> <urdmnf$1d3vr$2@dont-email.me> <NMK4r+7PMexyUgngk@bongo-ra.co>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 105IrWbn07HLtLTDZt+FuQuyqqPdzMO/RiNAI47P25cKK9
Cancel-Lock: sha1:SUHf+yxr/Y34n2ucDGPcg4CQ5z0= sha256:ASXY1x64cHE1Lnc4Tu1oU32YA5K/ISbhj2dyuMuqCCA=
X-Copyright: (C) Copyright 2024 Stefan Ram. All rights reserved.
Distribution through any means other than regular usenet
channels is forbidden. It is forbidden to publish this
article in the Web, to change URIs of this article into links,
and to transfer the body without this notice, but quotations
of parts in other Usenet posts are allowed.
X-No-Archive: Yes
Archive: no
X-No-Archive-Readme: "X-No-Archive" is set, because this prevents some
services to mirror the article in the web. But the article may
be kept on a Usenet archive server with only NNTP access.
X-No-Html: yes
Content-Language: en-US
Accept-Language: de-DE-1901, en-US, it, fr-FR
Lines beginning with ">" are from the post at the end of the References:
>fseek(bin, -3, SEEK_END);
I am now testing a new attribution line added by my post script
(which I have written in Python). - If one still should read
"writes:", above something went wrong.
While I usually do post test posts to test newsgroups, in this case,
I post to "comp.lang.c", so that Spiros can see my new attribution
line and complain again should he still deem it to be misleading.