| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<b08cb1919074c226cfa4b1fa9a12a51a8ca619b5@i2pn2.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- COMPLETE PROOF
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 23:21:36 -0500
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <b08cb1919074c226cfa4b1fa9a12a51a8ca619b5@i2pn2.org>
References: <vo6420$3mpmf$1@dont-email.me> <vo7be3$jug$1@dont-email.me>
<vo7r8d$36ra$3@dont-email.me> <vo9ura$i5ha$1@dont-email.me>
<voahc5$m3dj$8@dont-email.me> <vocdo9$14kc0$1@dont-email.me>
<vocpl7$16c4e$4@dont-email.me> <vof56u$1n9k0$1@dont-email.me>
<vofnj2$1qh2r$2@dont-email.me> <vohrmi$29f46$1@dont-email.me>
<vojs0e$2oikq$4@dont-email.me> <vokdha$2rcqi$1@dont-email.me>
<vom1fr$34osr$1@dont-email.me> <von0iq$3d619$1@dont-email.me>
<vondj5$3ffar$1@dont-email.me> <vopke4$3v10c$1@dont-email.me>
<vore4m$9ddo$1@dont-email.me> <vpkq6t$22eec$1@dont-email.me>
<vpl0h8$23vks$4@dont-email.me>
<191218123f5c1b2337c116736b05c8ee64115128@i2pn2.org>
<vplssg$28j3a$4@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 04:21:36 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
logging-data="1816923"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vplssg$28j3a$4@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 3288
Lines: 63
On 2/25/25 9:05 PM, olcott wrote:
> On 2/25/2025 5:41 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 2/25/25 1:01 PM, olcott wrote:
>>> On 2/25/2025 10:13 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>> Althogh the subject line has the words "COMPLETE PROOF" there is no
>>>> proof or pointer to proof below.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> typedef void (*ptr)();
>>> int HHH(ptr P);
>>>
>>> int DD()
>>> {
>>> int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
>>> if (Halt_Status)
>>> HERE: goto HERE;
>>> return Halt_Status;
>>> }
>>>
>>> int main()
>>> {
>>> HHH(DD);
>>> }
>>>
>>> The above does specify that DD simulated by HHH
>>> cannot possibly terminate normally by reaching its
>>> own "return" instruction.
>>>
>>> That this may be beyond your technical skill level.
>>> is less than no rebuttal at all.
>>>
>>> Ignoring the code in main() seemed dishonest.
>>>
>>
>> Since it isn't part of the problem, why is that?
>>
>
> Requiring main() makes it dead obvious when anyone
> is trying to get away with the strawman deception.
> You keep trying to get away with changing the subject
> away from DD emulated by HHH.
>
SL, you admit that everything you have said is a lie.
Where is "main" mentioned in the "Halting Problem"
Nowhere, so your requirement for main is just your strawman,
What about the program:
int main() {
HHH(DD);
DD();
}
That program proves that DD as a program will return.
If you say that changes the behavior of DD, then you need to show where
you are getting your definitions, as that is just a lie.
Sorry to be so blunt, but you are just proving how stupid you are, and
how everything you have done is just a FRAUD.