Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly
 met
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 21:51:59 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <b0b999743982b8c4689c918d9d539ff2bd742544@i2pn2.org>
References: <vv97ft$3fg66$1@dont-email.me>
 <87jz6qczja.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <vvjotc$28g5i$12@dont-email.me>
 <vvnh9u$3hd96$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <vvno4e$3in62$2@dont-email.me> <vvo71c$rlt$1@news.muc.de>
 <PlNTP.270466$lZjd.128570@fx05.ams4> <vvochv$15td$2@news.muc.de>
 <vvodn5$3na6l$3@dont-email.me>
 <1276edeb9893085c59b02bbbd59fe2c64011736b@i2pn2.org>
 <vvqk4s$gldn$12@dont-email.me> <vvqln4$g8ck$5@dont-email.me>
 <vvrftj$ndkg$1@dont-email.me> <vvrima$nejb$3@dont-email.me>
 <vvua3t$1hm37$1@dont-email.me>
 <cd36dcf87daefa9ae472cc426d57704c2baa4292@i2pn2.org>
 <10000hl$1v330$1@dont-email.me> <1000c4g$21dtc$2@dont-email.me>
 <1000ps6$24gr3$1@dont-email.me> <1000qd3$24jh0$1@dont-email.me>
 <1000r3j$24gr3$5@dont-email.me> <1000sa5$24sr2$2@dont-email.me>
 <1000skj$24gr3$9@dont-email.me> <1000t6r$24sr2$5@dont-email.me>
 <1000tbh$24gr3$12@dont-email.me> <100100k$29e7u$2@dont-email.me>
 <ee7015d55d1b71642a631530d0f4d3c52dafed9a@i2pn2.org>
 <1002bgq$2i4bk$5@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 01:56:24 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="396594"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <1002bgq$2i4bk$5@dont-email.me>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0

On 5/14/25 11:06 AM, olcott wrote:
> On 5/14/2025 3:17 AM, joes wrote:
>> Am Tue, 13 May 2025 21:43:32 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>>> On 5/13/2025 8:58 PM, dbush wrote:
>>
>>>> Then maybe you should stop implying that Sipser agrees with the above
>>>> when it's been proven on multiple occasions that he has not.
>>>> *That* is dishonest.
>>>>
>>> I have the emails where he agreed that I could publish his agreement
>>> with those exact words. Ben also checked this and verified it.
>>
>> Please publish those instead of paraphrasing.
>>
> 
> He agreed that I could publish this.
> Ben checked with him at the time.
> 
> <MIT Professor Sipser agreed to ONLY these verbatim words 10/13/2022>
>      If simulating halt decider H correctly simulates its
>      input D until H correctly determines that its simulated D
>      would never stop running unless aborted then
> 
>      H can abort its simulation of D and correctly report that D
>      specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations.
> </MIT Professor Sipser agreed to ONLY these verbatim words 10/13/2022>
> 
> 

And since you have admitted that your DDD is not a program, them you 
can't satisfy that requirement, since in the above D *IS* a program.

Sorry, you admitted that your system doesn't qualify.