Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
Subject: Re: Anthropogenic Climate Change Denialism in SF
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 20:52:32 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <b0ee27eaac3817d463a5a905ff05856e@www.novabbs.com>
References: <robertaw-ED1870.21583806122024@news.individual.net> <vj25aj$4nd$1@reader2.panix.com> <robertaw-A7CB55.21594107122024@news.individual.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2240310"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="GSAUMsvIs05PgSAevbIzdWiOy1BcuThtiv166p5NnMk";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 7260c650ae4d5ba82d3b6b1eab0ac1b8653ff052
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$iMEDGBm.hdJrhp6j7NgL6.dEZY/wVidLuoqNXz5/FI0lPV6rhFltm
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 1817
Lines: 16

On Sun, 8 Dec 2024 5:59:41 +0000, Robert Woodward wrote:

> It was my impression that _Fallen Angels_ was the result of a successful
> attempt to significantly reduce CO2 emissions. If that is so, I wouldn't
> consider it to be ACC denialism at all.

Instead of denying the physics of the greenhouse effect, it denied that
there was any necessity to act to prevent global warming - because of
more complex factors, such as natural climate cycles, there was really
no problem, but these ideologically-driven fanatics kept going despite
their actions causing an ice age.

So in the debate about cutting emissions in response to the threat of
global warming, it was clear whose side he was on, and it was not the
side of the angels - or the side of Greta Thunberg.

John Savard