Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <b12aa5f97e37f7cba9385c81ab27888b@www.novabbs.com>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<b12aa5f97e37f7cba9385c81ab27888b@www.novabbs.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: How Einstein missed his opportunity to derive Lorentz  in Point
 =?UTF-8?B?wqczLg==?=
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2025 23:40:34 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <b12aa5f97e37f7cba9385c81ab27888b@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3341843"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="OjDMvaaXMeeN/7kNOPQl+dWI+zbnIp3mGAHMVhZ2e/A";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 26080b4f8b9f153eb24ebbc1b47c4c36ee247939
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$w2vnCLEwBPtwvcnX5BO22eu1a8/AoliDNNkFPwMBLt8FCRqho1I4W
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 4478
Lines: 130

I was reading again the English version (1923) of his 1905 paper, and
got
interested in a footnote from the editor:

QUOTE:
5The equations of the Lorentz transformation may be more simply deduced
directly from the condition that in virtue of those equations the
relation
x² + y² + z²  = c² t² shall have as its consequence the second relation
ξ² + η² + ζ²  = c²τ².
END QUOTE

As the above equations are EXACTLY what Poincaré postulated about space
and time,
and because Poincaré and Minkowski knew each other, so the latter used
Poincaré to
derive the spacetime shit, I searched about this kind of derivation
without Taylor, mirrors and CHEATS/HACKS.

This is based on the footnote and what Einstein wrote at the end of
Point §3 (PLAGIARIZED EXACTLY FROM POINCARÉ, SAME YEAR).

////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

QUOTING EINSTEIN IN Point §3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
We now have to prove that any ray of light, measured in the moving
system,
is propagated with the velocity c, if, as we have assumed, this is the
case
in the stationary system; for we have not as yet furnished the proof
that
the principle of the constancy of the velocity of light is compatible
with
the principle of relativity.

At the time t = τ = 0, when the origin of the co-ordinates is common to
the
two systems, let a spherical wave be emitted therefrom, and be
propagated
with the velocity c in system K. If (x, y, z) be a point just attained
by
this wave, then

x² + y² + z²  = c² t²

Transforming this equation with the aid of our equations of
transformation
we obtain after a simple calculation

ξ² + η² + ζ²  = c² τ²
------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is the derivation of Lorentz transforms using the above concepts:


***********************************************

He could have derived Lorentz transforms by simply postulating that as

c² t² - x² - y² - z²  = 0

and

c² τ² - ξ² - η² - ζ²  = 0

then

c² τ² - ξ² - η² - ζ²  = c² t² - x² - y² - z²

As y = η  and  z = ζ, this equation reduces to c² τ² - ξ²  = c² t² - x²

Assuming that ξ and x differs in a factor β from Galilean transform,
where β = 1, the new transform can be written as

ξ  = β (x - vt)

and

x  = β (ξ + v τ)

then

x  = β² (x - vt) + β v τ

β v τ = x (1 - β²) + β² v t

τ = x (1 - β²)/βv + β  t

τ = β [(1/β² - 1) x/v +  t]

Replacing ξ and τ in ξ² = c² τ², it follows that

β² (x - vt)² = c² β² [x (1/β² - 1) x/v +  t]²

Factoring the above equation with a little help of algebra, it's
obtained

[β² - c²β²/v² (1/β² - 1)] x² - 2 β² [v + c²/v (1/β² - 1)] xt = β² (c² -
v²) t²

To verify

x² + y² + z²  = c² t²

It's required that, in the previous equation,

[β² - c²β²/v² (1/β² - 1)] = 1

[v + c²/v (1/β² - 1)] = 0

β² (c² - v²) = c²

From the last equation,

β²  = c²/(c² - v²)

or

β  = 1/√(1 - v²/c²) , which is the modern factor Gamma (γ).

With this result of β  (γ), the transforms are

ξ  = β (x - vt) = (x - vt)/√(1 - v²/c²)

τ = β [(1/β² - 1) x/v +  t] = β (t - vx/c²) = (t - vx/c²)/√(1 - v²/c²)

Without the complex and FRAUDULENT use of calculus and algebra in the
first part of Point §3.

***********************************************