Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of The Shit
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 16:47:17 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <b1b968956f794d0e91a151e2c1647f4b@www.novabbs.com>
References: <17ee15afea6b29a3$410850$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3489305"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="p+/k+WRPC4XqxRx3JUZcWF5fRnK/u/hzv6aL21GRPZM";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$zjHCTxoFWEDfTZoJTsprjOrm5QmNwkXgY.lu4OMDPoTNI2/Qrg1FK
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 47dad9ee83da8658a9a980eb24d2d25075d9b155
Bytes: 2748
Lines: 52

On Thu, 22 Aug 2024 15:12:33 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second
> As seen, the definition of second loved so
> much to be invoked by relativistic morons -

Proof here that Wozniak is the one who slanders.

> wasn't valid in the time when their idiot guru
> lived and mumbled. Up to 1960 it was ordinary
> 1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.
>
> Now: an observer moving with c/2 wrt
> solar system is measuring the length
> of solar day. What is the result predicted
> by the Einsteinian physics?
> One prediction is - 99766. From the
> postulates. The second prediction is -
> 86400. From definition.
> And similiarly with the prediction of
> a measurement of a meridian.

Is this supposed to be Wozniak's so-called
"proof" that relativity is "inconsistent?
Wozniak conflates a moving observer with a
stationary observer looking at the same
clock, and somehow believes that they should
appear to be running at the same rate.

That is ludicrous since relativity proclaims
that they won't and, furthermore, experiment
demonstrates that they don't.  So Wozniak,
stuck in the 17th century, believing that
time must be universal, is the one who is
"inconsistent" (i.e., wrong).

> Thank you for your attention, poor
> relativistic fanatics, have a nice day.

More proof of Wozniak's insulting and slandering.
And then he whines that he is insulted and
slandered!  (He's not, he just gets a dose of
truth).

“Let me never fall into the vulgar mistake of
dreaming that I am persecuted whenever I am
contradicted.” -- Ralph Waldo Emerson

"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the
tool of the losers." -- Socrates

Wozniak lost the debate a long time ago, but
he still peddles his delusions.