Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Zionazi <marcs12212@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
Subject: Re: What is the reason for this piano duo =?UTF-8?B?bGF5b3V0Pw==?=
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 05:24:23 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <b1dae44663fc231798856c923df858b6@www.novabbs.com>
References: <71a12235f2ee60320795199f621572e8@www.novabbs.com> <vst7ld$334o4$1@paganini.bofh.team> <2581c86a278b6d5e6d13a16515c445fc@www.novabbs.com> <vsu9cb$34piu$1@paganini.bofh.team> <511edf70b86750c2cc68be643cfd329b@www.novabbs.com> <vsvmhf$2ufpf$1@dont-email.me> <8468c08871b19e08c4a54ad46766167a@www.novabbs.com> <vt1blr$3ehtb$1@paganini.bofh.team> <ac483e42702fa4e76e95acfea18b119f@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3613790"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="eF/RVKLh6aEp9s+BK8BYt5fEoUMxZQLVFJ5zi19LlgQ";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$6oE8dtiQ0E0uaZtNNU6P..VUC9arbTyO41R1khIz/.88fxFP4WJqu
X-Rslight-Posting-User: b8ea6db213d7f55d7e0ffe462de55ace7b9a5d91
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 3078
Lines: 42

On Mon, 7 Apr 2025 23:25:30 +0000, DeepBlue wrote:

> On Mon, 7 Apr 2025 20:13:47 +0000, PPeso wrote:
>> On 4/7/2025 2:09 PM, DeepBlue wrote:
>>> it sounds to me like
>>> "any manner of performing a musical work that is different
>>> from what the compawser 'intended' or on instruments that
>>> are however slightly different from those used during the
>>> times when the work was composed, or in a manner that is
>>> different from the performing practice during those times
>>> is a 'transcription' ".
>>
>> Yes.
>
> In other words, there is no room for "interpretation"
> between the cold dead letter of the score and what
> you describe as "transcription". You are a strict
> literalist just as I had thought.

That’s Not what he said. Your narcissistic brain makes up a lot of
nonsense as usual just because You’ve lost the Argument — Argerich and
Pletnev suck really Bad btw, it’s still Eschenbach and Frantz. Seems you
are not an Elite in the ranks of the spiritual when it comes to your
Musical Taste After all 8(

As we can See here people, narcissists when losing an Argument tend to
become bitter and resentful, going on to attack the other Person
(„You’re a strict literarist“ etc - lol no, dan You’re just too stupid
to acknowledge You’ve lost this Argument) — instead of Dan acknowledging
his stupidity, he digs his whole deeper by being even more stupid ;)
narcissists are idiots.

>
> Fair enough, we will make a note and remember to
> correct you every time you write "interpretation".
>
> As to Mr. Schuhbert, he could have bought himself
> a better piano or two.
>
> Cheers!

One can’t Communicate with a narcissist. Its a one-way-street — this is
something even Herman understood ;)