Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<b5dIwHBeGg4eXRnws4LOWxdcRMc@jntp> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp Message-ID: <b5dIwHBeGg4eXRnws4LOWxdcRMc@jntp> JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net JNTP-DataType: Article Subject: Re: Oh my God! References: <Ev7wMrtKlxguxDn1RDUke8-o3Zo@jntp> <llpubiFgheaU8@mid.individual.net> <Zq1pHnYCgAwr5qC37tYAjjYmORY@jntp> <c343b16e27e0220d0b586aadaac601bb@www.novabbs.com> <38a724f9aa7028dc455f71fda36abdb8@www.novabbs.com> <ad8212d173bdfb8447f337e7cbc13dda@novabbs.com> <1ea43eb5545f362bbcdb802e857bb126@www.novabbs.com> <ed8708d5473172c7f8fb0799eb5753a1@www.novabbs.com> <a7c57e3f538be43cae943e94dff13256@www.novabbs.com> <l6AmsdDNIllI4cFlM0JWuTI4tjU@jntp> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity JNTP-HashClient: 4ccQSYNIGjGf0IPVYGsO7EKnzgc JNTP-ThreadID: _NOMLwbBk0j_174bZ23omUtCEHM JNTP-ReferenceUserID: 4@nemoweb.net JNTP-Uri: https://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=b5dIwHBeGg4eXRnws4LOWxdcRMc@jntp User-Agent: Nemo/1.0 JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net Date: Tue, 01 Oct 24 21:56:49 +0000 Organization: Nemoweb JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/115.0 Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="249ce843916bfc5ffd3ad5037c6014490213f129"; logging-data="2024-10-01T21:56:49Z/9044506"; posting-account="190@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com" JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1 JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96 From: Python <python@not-formail.invalid> Bytes: 3574 Lines: 47 Le 01/10/2024 à 21:11, Richard Hachel a écrit : > Le 01/10/2024 à 20:47, hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) a écrit : >> On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 15:55:04 +0000, ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog wrote: > >> >> And you haven't acknowledged your confusion about what frame >> is the "stationary" one in the right and left figures. Just >> proclaiming a frame as stationary doesn't make it so, particularly >> when you draw its time axis skewed. > > It is true that this mania for drawing oblique axes with all the possible > fancies is absolutely distressing. > > But that is not the worst. > > The worst is that they think, probably with conviction, that not only should the > world be made as they draw it, but that in addition their stupid lines are very > beautiful. > > We then enter into what future generations will call the relativistic crime, > which does not consist in being wrong (everyone has the right to be wrong) but in > spitting on Doctor Hachel who had given them everything, from the resolution of > the Langevin paradox, to the resolution of the Ehrenfest paradox, including the > developed equations of uniformly accelerated frames of reference. > > That is what is worthy of making one bray like a donkey. > > I have again shown by two very simple diagrams, here, on September 27 at 5:04 > p.m. that it was much more beautiful and especially much more correct to draw > horizontal lines of simultaneity. Your "diagrams" are utterly idiotic. > This beauty and this scientific truth seem to hurt the eyes. > > We have been living in a crazy world since antiquity. A crazy world where were conceived and build steam engines, trains, cars, planes, rockets, atomic bombs (oops), nuclear power plants. We travelled to the Moon and back, launched satellites, created computers, vaccines and radars. Not that bad for a "crazy world", don't you think?