| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<b60987fbf096c7b1559159b7d1b5c52a59eb5cf3@i2pn2.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: Replacement of Cardinality Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2024 10:17:28 -0400 Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <b60987fbf096c7b1559159b7d1b5c52a59eb5cf3@i2pn2.org> References: <hsRF8g6ZiIZRPFaWbZaL2jR1IiU@jntp> <45ad1007-b1a7-49d0-a650-048f02738226@att.net> <ZrUpfgO3RQL0qsj_ugH_ng035iM@jntp> <e51a19c8-9f22-43ec-a382-b93019b4ce1d@att.net> <Aj67svgBqlC6ubyAZ01SM3EN5mc@jntp> <9ef8dd8a-69be-44e2-bcf6-ea9c1fb30e21@att.net> <LHtSphVaxvF9i9lsFtvEfbB4PS8@jntp> <2e01bd19df4cd4dadc417349d86040fa204b960b@i2pn2.org> <eHFsweuOlnr4FWEvZev7y4BnvoE@jntp> <1dd8ed7d-e66a-4149-b754-08f3296842c2@att.net> <TRnpolbxvBo6oSSQfG6rUxEqa4o@jntp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2024 14:17:28 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="2897736"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg"; User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <TRnpolbxvBo6oSSQfG6rUxEqa4o@jntp> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Bytes: 1977 Lines: 24 On 8/17/24 9:30 AM, WM wrote: > Le 16/08/2024 à 19:54, Jim Burns a écrit : >> On 8/16/2024 1:00 PM, WM wrote: > >>> Start from x = 0. >>> The increase cannot be more than 1. >>> ∀n ∈ ℕ: 1/n - 1/(n+1) > 0 >> >> Start from x = 0 >> The increase cannot be less than 2 > > That violates ∀n ∈ ℕ: 1/n - 1/(n+1) > 0 . > >> ∀ᴿx > 0: x > ⅟nₓ > ⅟(nₓ+1) >> nₓ = ⌊1+⅟x⌋ > > That holds only for definable numbers. > > Regards, WM > > Which is all of the Rational Numbers, and thus all of the unit fractions. Thats your problem, you don't seem to know how to definie numbers.