Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<b6lbflxg2q.ln2@Telcontar.valinor>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: The Spanish Grid Drop-out - recently released information.
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 12:57:47 +0200
Lines: 146
Message-ID: <b6lbflxg2q.ln2@Telcontar.valinor>
References: <vvnvto$3kd3i$1@dont-email.me> <vvo0k4$3kq8j$1@dont-email.me>
 <vvo5gv$3lr47$1@dont-email.me> <rf8v1klb6d9djefqfr2e2g8f9k3lgotka2@4ax.com>
 <qRTTP.120685$vK4b.43405@fx09.ams4>
 <qtb42kdu0hi53rdatftund6ho5s0hpi0o3@4ax.com> <vvuhj7$1it85$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net 3padE7mDwq2drbUlKEldXg+33beDFU6EQf92fbBQ6kXtULvDkE
X-Orig-Path: Telcontar.valinor!not-for-mail
Cancel-Lock: sha1:8l/Bs7DCQbAQv0hSTbQ+LRkffYA= sha256:u9FKSmm8c/t/1CLUv7xmJZX5+66/XM6o3WeQnKbI3bM=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: es-ES, en-CA
In-Reply-To: <vvuhj7$1it85$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 7137

On 2025-05-13 06:25, Bill Sloman wrote:
> On 13/05/2025 3:35 am, john larkin wrote:
>> On Sun, 11 May 2025 12:22:11 +1000, Chris Jones
>> <lugnut808@spam.yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/05/2025 5:04 am, john larkin wrote:
>>>
>>>> As solar and wind get to be dominant, micromanagement of power sources
>>>> and loads will be necessary to ensure uptime.
>>>
>>> This is largely unnecessary - if the control signal that was being sent
>>> out by the central controller to micromanage each power source was
>>> derived from a function of the frequency, phase, voltage etc., then
>>> rather than trying to distribute the result of this calculation to
>>> millions of devices with low latency, it is better to distribute just
>>> the formula (once every few years or as necessary), and run it on a
>>> microcontroller in the inverters several times every mains cycle. They
>>> already have more than enough processing power.
>>
>> A central (international!) controller would want to know what every
>> contributor was pushing into the grid, and probably see wind flow and
>> clouds moving around. One local transmission line could fail and take
>> down half of Europe. Again.
> 
> What makes you think that?
> The current control system clearly isn't that well informed, and it 
> works pretty much all the time.
> 
>>> I believe that there are some new regulatuions in at least one 
>>> Australian
>>> state, driven by the (fossil-fuel-stoked) fear of "too much solar
>>> destabilising the grid", which require new home solar inverters to stop
>>> exporting power, unless they receive continuous "permission to export"
>>> signals from our overlords, the network operators. In other words,
>>> rather than exporting power in the case of communications failure, it
>>> goes into the state of "export no power" in case of communications
>>> failure, because otherwise people might unplug their internet to export
>>> more scary solar power if exporting power was allowed when the internet
>>> connection fails.
> 
> This is nonsense. The Australian grid don't like having to deal with 
> excess power being exported by roof-top solar installation, and 
> discourage people from doing it, to the point where 40% of new roof-top 
> solar installations in Australia include a Tesla Powerwall or an 
> equivalent battery, and don't export anything.
> 
>>> This is a fairly new requirement, so not many
>>> compliant devices are installed now, but once a few gigawatts of these
>>> inverters are running, it will be interesting to see what happens when
>>> there is a major internet outage on a hot summer day, and all of those
>>> gigawatts suddenly go away. Hopefully they thought of that but I 
>>> doubt it.
>>>
>>> The rapid control algorithms should be distributed, and the only
>>> low-latency communication signals they should rely upon are frequency
>>> and voltage.
>>
>> A solar panel with an algorithm can't know about potential system
>> overloads. Solar and wind will have to be shed sometimes to protect
>> the entire system. Loads shed too. Renewable-heavy grids are fragile.
> 
> The existing system doesn't know about potential system overloads, and 
> it works pretty much all the time. Regular grids are fragile too.
> 
> The renewable-heavy grid in South Australia was fragile, until they 
> bought the world first grid scale battery in 2017.
> 
> https://hornsdalepowerreserve.com.au/
> 
> They promptly devoted half the battery to short term phase correction 
> and frequency satabilisation, and it isn't fragile any more.
> 
> Carlos says that the Spanish mainland grid hasn't got any storage - no 
> grid battery and no pumped hydro, which is a bit silly.

No, no grid batteries yet. Pumped hydro there is somewhere; some island 
have it for sure, it has gone an entire month on renewables alone.

I asked chatgpt:

              Does the Spanish electricity network has storage capability?

Yes, the Spanish electricity network does have storage capabilities, but 
on a limited scale relative to its overall electricity demand and 
production.


*Key Points:*

1. Pumped Hydro Storage

This is the main form of energy storage in Spain. It's a mature and 
widely used technology that involves pumping water uphill to a reservoir 
during times of low electricity demand and releasing it to generate 
electricity during peak demand.

     Spain has several pumped hydro plants, including:

         La Muela II (one of the largest in Europe)

         Estany Gento-Sallente

     Total pumped hydro storage capacity in Spain is estimated to be 
around 6 GW (gigawatts) of installed capacity.

2. Battery Storage

     Grid-scale battery storage is still in early development in Spain 
but is growing.

     Projects have been announced or launched, particularly to 
complement renewable energy (especially solar and wind).

     As of recent years, installed battery capacity is relatively small 
(in the tens to hundreds of megawatts), but it's expected to grow 
significantly under Spain’s energy transition plans.

3. Other Technologies

     Thermal storage: Used in concentrated solar power (CSP) plants, 
where molten salts store heat that can be used to generate electricity 
after the sun goes down.

     Hydrogen: In development, with pilot projects aiming to use green 
hydrogen for seasonal or long-duration storage.

4. Future Plans

Spain's National Energy and Climate Plan (NECP) and other strategic 
documents aim to:

     Expand storage to around 20 GW by 2030, including batteries, pumped 
hydro, and other technologies.

     Enable better integration of intermittent renewables like wind and 
solar.

Conclusion:

Yes, Spain's electricity network has storage capabilities, primarily 
through pumped hydro, with growing use of batteries and thermal storage. 
Significant expansion is planned to support the country's renewable 
energy targets and grid stability.

-- 
Cheers, Carlos.