Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<b6tc5j59r2a7ilif79aav4cvqiatj49mcl@4ax.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news-out.netnews.com!postmaster.netnews.com!us11.netnews.com!not-for-mail
X-Trace: DXC=95P<loR17509XDEh4VolD0HWonT5<]0T=djI?Uho:Xe;lL51CP6LDL<95GMl]75=81Og<^]<AIUC57@<I4Rf8bA1l3[[dIf;_m62Do^b@=QS77
X-Complaints-To: support@blocknews.net
From: Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Do Microsoft’s Copilot+ PCs Require Linux?
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 20:21:29 -0400
Message-ID: <b6tc5j59r2a7ilif79aav4cvqiatj49mcl@4ax.com>
References: <66523fb2$0$1258345$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <v2u2cj$33vus$1@dont-email.me> <v2v9fr$3daer$4@dont-email.me> <v2vc53$3dkln$3@dont-email.me> <v30g0c$3lhel$3@dont-email.me> <slrnv5a4g0.8c8.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> <v33c75$ddl1$4@dont-email.me> <slrnv5aeav.hse.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> <v33tqh$ftv1$1@dont-email.me> <IOm5O.49633$In22.32827@fx11.iad> <mfub5jl5sjf4m2rlnq7h8qtqi77nvkvv0g@4ax.com> <v35pvi$qao6$6@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
OS: Linux Mint 21.3 Cinnamon, with Wine 9.0 for WinAPI
Lines: 35
NNTP-Posting-Host: 127.0.0.1
X-Trace: 1716942089 reader.netnews.com 2363147 127.0.0.1:43883
Bytes: 2516

Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
>On Tue, 28 May 2024 11:38:28 -0400, Joel wrote:
>> Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote:
>> 
>>> Stop being a zealot for just a second and be objective about things. I
>>> guarantee you that Stallman is not a messiah.
>> 
>> Lawrence is not the brightest guy, but you're one to talk about that,
>> retard.
>
>What is this? Fractures among the ranks of the Dimdows fan(atic)s? Can’t 
>figure out how to present a united front against the Relentless Linux 
>Onslaught?


I'm no longer a fan of Winblows, although I don't *hate* it, I just
want nothing to do with it.  Linux for life, until something entirely
different would in theory replace it, which I'm not holding my breath
for in my lifetime.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.