Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DDD specifies recursive emulation to HHH and halting to HHH1
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 20:33:47 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <b73ee5d80df9b180d6345bb08b6b5454947601cb@i2pn2.org>
References: <vrfuob$256og$1@dont-email.me> <vs5r0j$2f37e$1@dont-email.me>
	<vs6srk$39556$12@dont-email.me> <vs6t10$2p360$6@dont-email.me>
	<vs70tc$39556$21@dont-email.me> <vs71bq$2p360$10@dont-email.me>
	<vs76m9$3m3q0$1@dont-email.me> <vs77th$2p360$11@dont-email.me>
	<vs78cu$3ms9k$1@dont-email.me>
	<c2b91231b9052e07b6705250938fb9095e711327@i2pn2.org>
	<vs7kvf$3eal$2@dont-email.me>
	<aeb75b411e9f77c974585181c671a47d03b22078@i2pn2.org>
	<vs7qdm$8dae$2@dont-email.me> <vs7r9b$8ajp$1@dont-email.me>
	<vs92l3$1fccq$5@dont-email.me> <vs93ae$1k9u2$1@dont-email.me>
	<vs9g5p$1v2n9$5@dont-email.me> <vs9gcg$20g2j$3@dont-email.me>
	<vs9h9o$23cav$2@dont-email.me> <vs9hh3$20g2j$6@dont-email.me>
	<vs9jie$23cav$4@dont-email.me> <vs9kb1$26cg5$2@dont-email.me>
	<vs9pni$27rl4$9@dont-email.me>
	<3ade9e84224ba9b99c7363e0e9b69181804b7daa@i2pn2.org>
	<vsc2fd$1vihj$2@dont-email.me>
	<e1da7d564873d36f88e119fbbbdafd8c6b0f675e@i2pn2.org>
	<vsc9o7$2bk3d$2@dont-email.me> <vsdjis$3o5ff$2@dont-email.me>
	<vselvf$th5g$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 20:33:47 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2583426"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0

Am Mon, 31 Mar 2025 13:13:04 -0500 schrieb olcott:
> On 3/31/2025 3:26 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:

>> But we all agree that HHH fails to reach the end of the simulation of
>> this finite recursion. An end that exists as proven by direct execution
>> and world class simulators. Why repeating this agreement as if someone
>> denies it?
> 
> Because DDD calls HHH(DDD) in recursive emulation DDD EMULATED BY HHH
> CANNOT POSSIIBLY HALT.
That is the failure.

-- 
Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:
It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.