| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<b94e2f260b0b3a27fe82c7ceef7b7486@www.novabbs.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Relativity Derives Zero Deflection of Light By Gravity. Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:37:59 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: <b94e2f260b0b3a27fe82c7ceef7b7486@www.novabbs.com> References: <9f779645de1a83b1f2f35ab0a1885329@www.novabbs.com> <6c677b972f6579892c33b8604d495734@www.novabbs.com> <c610c41468d186a5b9e30f6cd312a34d@www.novabbs.com> <6d5e3cb2d661d9fb995ce04347694f19@www.novabbs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="1006888"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="HcQFdl4zp4UQRQ9N18ivMn6Fl9V8n4SPkK4oZHLgYdQ"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$0EsgMEiPEZbQMg/yvpHTJuHkJXENV3q6QDcwGViUeaO0YqsEyofmi X-Rslight-Posting-User: a2f761a7401f13abeefca3440f16b2f27b708180 On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:35:18 +0000, JanPB wrote: > On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 21:42:01 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote: > >> On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 20:39:33 +0000, JanPB wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 15:28:06 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote: >>> >>>> The mass-velocity relationship prevents photons from having any mass. >>>> Therefore, they cannot be affected by gravity. >>> >>> Gravity couples to eneregy-momentum (all 10 components of it), not >>> just the mass (the 00-component). >>> >>> -- >>> Jan >>> >>> -- >> What you and the consensus believes is nonsense because the momentum >> formula requires mass. > > Incorrect. > >> Mass is a prerequisite. > > Incorrect. Why don't you study physics before pontificating idiocies? > >> Massless particles would >> have no momentum. > > Nonsense. You simply repeat a bit of elementary school physics that > you never progressed past. > >> You are very confused. You are arguing from authority >> instead of reasoning. That is ad verecundium, a failure to reason. >> Gravity does not couple with massless particles. > > I'm simply saying that you have no idea what you are talking about. > > -- > Jan > > -- I'm not pontificating. I'm only giving my opinion. At least I give reasons for mine. If you had any idea what you were talking about, you would give your reasons. Expressing your opinion without doing so is pontificating. Until then, we have no evidence that you know what you are discussing. Babylon: "pontificate[pon·tif·i·cate || pɑn'tɪfɪkət /pɒn-] v. serve as Pope; behave pompously, act self-righteously.