Path: nntp.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor)
Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.math
Subject: Re: Positrons
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2025 04:27:18 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <b97558f662745e5702f2a67d7c71c6fe@www.novabbs.com>
References: <positron-20250705204007@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3572060"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="4CIDjmRjWbqC4EEN5EcU+HA+pIaOwwy51Z63DnRPIoA";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$rBBwvemsrXGB3oJsLHZ8oeLFdspcikn1KPx75fgGu7I51Y/DdVmh2
X-Rslight-Posting-User: d1111375bdddd1d0b42e6fbe96c9934b24d8a010

On Sat, 5 Jul 2025 19:43:23 +0000, Stefan Ram wrote:

> Aether Regained <AetherRegaind@somewhere.in.the.aether> wrote or quoted:
> |                                                              The
> |evidence for the positron is a lot stronger than the evidence for say
> |quarks.

There is plenty of evidence for Harry Potter and his broomstick.
>
>   We probably shouldn't think of these particles as something out
>   there on their own. They're more like tools we came up with so
>   we could build devices that work off those ideas. So, it's really
>   about whether a certain particle actually /comes in handy/.
>
>   The positron turned out to be pretty useful. Just look at the PET
>   (Positron Emission Tomography) scanner. There's a lot of solid proof
>   that PET scanners have helped save lives by letting doctors spot
>   how diseases are moving along and see if treatments are working.

Checked that out. Looks like it works on radioactive injections and
consequent radiation. Nowhere is it said that positrons are radiated
like say beta rays.

Simply calling it pet does not prove the existence of positrons. Just as
calling fast computing quantum computing does not prove quantum theory.


>
>   (We look back now and think folks way back were clueless for
>   believing planets moved around the sun on /epicycles/. But
>   honestly, the ancient astronomers who came up with epicycles
>   - like Apollonius of Perga, Hipparchus, and especially Ptolemy -
>   didn't actually buy into that! They knew those were just /handy
>   tools/ for figuring out where the planets would be later on.)

--