Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <bWOZ4BhQosRlS-XAfEkGsknJwRc@jntp>
JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Replacement of Cardinality
References: <hsRF8g6ZiIZRPFaWbZaL2jR1IiU@jntp> <GknMvtkLnWBwOVHuwhpOvuPVwIg@jntp>
 <5d289c3ad609a69bad184ed6c95fbedc401f0189@i2pn2.org> <CL-CpLVceqNZ5MK6wf1XbuKQEo4@jntp>
 <3fafe57018c41eaa478c6ada3df62f4d0a00d51e@i2pn2.org> <OXlvm-eK1v5HrCZkGbHkq1lHzY8@jntp>
 <6cc116c789d9655c5142f02ae570f87d38f6a578@i2pn2.org> <vas606$epel$1@dont-email.me> <LsZJcLTh_0Tan0JmhRtRomPoNYw@jntp>
 <00a5d2bbd74e03706c615217837bed65a9412c17@i2pn2.org>
Newsgroups: sci.math
JNTP-HashClient: fBPug9M76MHVhpWO8L7n4_cy1Y4
JNTP-ThreadID: KFm3f7lT2HjaTSiMfnv5xqZoSBw
JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=bWOZ4BhQosRlS-XAfEkGsknJwRc@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a
JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 24 15:29:22 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/128.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="82b75c1d0a83e677ff646b52485f72f8b23749df"; logging-data="2024-08-30T15:29:22Z/9006055"; posting-account="217@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de>
Bytes: 2530
Lines: 25

Le 30/08/2024 à 15:23, Richard Damon a écrit :
> On 8/30/24 8:59 AM, WM wrote:
>> Le 30/08/2024 à 12:13, Moebius a écrit :
>>> Am 30.08.2024 um 09:21 schrieb joes:

>>> So no matter if x > 0 is infinitesimal or not: NUF(x) =/= 1.
>> 
>> Are there two unit fractions possible lessorequal than all unit fractions?
>> 
> No, because nothing is smaller than itself, and two unequal order things 
> must have an order.

Not both can be the smallest. Hence only one is the first.
> 
> But there ARE two unit fractions less than ANY given unit fraction.

Of course. Any given unit fraction can be given and therefore is visible.
> 
> You just apply the wrong qualifiers because you logic system is broken.

No. I apply this way in oder to show the more intelligent readers among 
you, than there is NUF(x) = 1.

Regards, WM