Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <ba514a642dbc509bb047ff2f3dec0bdb@www.novabbs.com>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<ba514a642dbc509bb047ff2f3dec0bdb@www.novabbs.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Space and spacetime
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 18:47:51 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <ba514a642dbc509bb047ff2f3dec0bdb@www.novabbs.com>
References: <v4k05l$3agjr$3@paganini.bofh.team> <ccf5155edb060554bdacb76d43c78f36@www.novabbs.com> <17dabca9290af769$189571$436234$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <93708b1befdea8fb7c18da1b3d12630d@www.novabbs.com> <17dac4a0a98761ea$266527$441546$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <9ae2e2bf5f37a77b3e1bd160981c6fd5@www.novabbs.com> <17db1164fde32607$208349$436234$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <392fcd2a13fa911f8f6d5182fb485f7b@www.novabbs.com> <17db1a8a53f81f54$288216$441546$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <766d95371391c171627beb10f0e1ae9c@www.novabbs.com> <17db25828bda4e92$4$479221$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <57daee8da23d6ae5103795e3c9012685@www.novabbs.com> <17db37832753b835$79$484409$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <3a011479b6a372004336be3d26a210b2@www.novabbs.com> <17db5d8196a1506d$500$479221$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="839109"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="p+/k+WRPC4XqxRx3JUZcWF5fRnK/u/hzv6aL21GRPZM";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 47dad9ee83da8658a9a980eb24d2d25075d9b155
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$mN0k/dO/84PaCfWy8GE9.OonOT30gmNM3F1jYExgw4JHoDnvDF0g.
Bytes: 5113
Lines: 103

Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
> W dniu 22.06.2024 o 15:54, gharnagel pisze:
> >
> > Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> > >
> > > You're pretending even stupider
> > > than you are to dodge.
> > 
>> No matter how many times Wozzie tells lies, i doesn't
> > make them true.  His parents must be chagrinned at
> > his abysmal behavior.
>
> And why won't you stop your iditic dodging
> and answer what are the prediction of the moronic
> physics of your moronic guru for my example?

Wozzie "question" was "What does an observer going at
c/2 through the solar system measure as the length of
a day?"

Since the observer is not on earth, a "day" is not well
defined.  I asked him if it was a day on earth, Mars,
Jupiter, what?  Also, since velocity is relative, what is
the c/s with respect to?  Autistic Wozzie-fool has refused
to answer these pertinent questions, proving his dishonesty
by asking stupid and irrelevant questions in return:

> > > You must define "clearly and honestly". And "define".
> > > And "must".
> > 
> > Such terms are human terms, and those that are fully human
> > understand them implicitly.  Terms like "speed" and "time"
>
> are the terms of physicists, i.e. Gods.
> I'm getting it.

??  Wozzie makes no sense, as usual.

Then he pivots to a different question:

> > > > > So, according to you and your idiot gurus -
> > > > > in LET every observer, stationary in ether or not -
> > > > > would observe light moving at speed c. Right?
> > > >
> > > > What's the matter, mathematically-incompetent Wozzie,
> > > > can't actually USE the theory and calculate the answer
> > > > for yourself?

And dishonest Wozzie projects his incompetence on others:

And then he pivots to a third question:

"Is the RELATIVISTIC formula of velocity adding a part of
Lorentz's ETHER theory?  Yes or no"

So it's become quite confusing just which question Wozzie
wants answered.

> > > The matter is that mathematically-incompetent Harrie
> > > can't actually USE the theory and calculate the answer
> > > for me.
> > 
> > I offered to derive the LTE for Wozzie,
>
> But can't deal with a set of assumptions
> different than The Shit of your idiot guru.
> It's not very complicated, but - well -
> you're an idiot.

Wozzie-liar is projecting again.

> > > A lie, of course. First - Lorentz invented his
> > > equations for his ether theory,  then - your
> > > idiot guru came with his absurd postulates.
> > 
> > So the "absurd" postulates result in the LTE  exactly as
> > Lorentz invented them out of whole cloth, so how could they
> > possibly be absurd
>
> Simply.

Yes, Wozzie is a simpleton.

> > > Unlike the Holy Postulates,  told your
> > > idiot gurus by Nature itself when She
> > > spoke to them. Right, Harrie?
> > 
> > Postulates are human constructs also, but they can be tested
> > against [nature].
>
> Only such an idiot can believe and repeat such
> an absurd lie.

So Wozzie denies that human constructs (like the constancy of the
speed of light) can't be tested against nature?  What is the matter
with this demented fool?

> But - see: 0 meridian has something in common with both The Shit
> of  your idiot guru and Lorontz ether theory, after all...

So Wozzie believes that 0 meridian is a fundamental property of
nature, like the speed of light?  This moron has gone totally off
the rails.  Python, call that nurse NOW!