Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<ba8009c254df574bb228d1c1246bc814c0d0f33c@i2pn2.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: And the Richer Petard Horror Show resumes ... Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 21:38:36 -0400 Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <ba8009c254df574bb228d1c1246bc814c0d0f33c@i2pn2.org> References: <ve39pb$24k00$1@dont-email.me> <39f1a350cac0a8431753486526da1c35f458df65@i2pn2.org> <ve6lsa$207d$2@news.muc.de> <ve8289$336c8$1@dont-email.me> <ve91hf$1ab4$1@news.muc.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 01:38:37 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="1485281"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg"; User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 In-Reply-To: <ve91hf$1ab4$1@news.muc.de> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 3400 Lines: 56 On 10/10/24 1:05 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> wrote: >> On 2024-10-09 19:34:34 +0000, Alan Mackenzie said: > >>> Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> wrote: >>>> On 10/8/24 8:49 AM, Andy Walker wrote: >>>>> ... after a short break. > >>>>> Richard -- no-one sane carries on an extended discussion with >>>>> someone they [claim to] consider a "stupid liar". So which are you? >>>>> Not sane? Or stupid enough to try to score points off someone who is >>>>> incapable of conceding them? Or lying when you describe Peter? You >>>>> must surely have better things to do. Meanwhile, you surely noticed >>>>> that Peter is running rings around you. > >>>> In other words, you don't understand the concept of defense of the truth. > >>> Maybe, but continuously calling your debating opponent a liar, and doing >>> so in oversized upper case, goes beyond truth and comes perilously close >>> to stalking. > >> Calling a liar a liar is fully justified. I don't know how often it >> needs be done but readers of a liar may want to know that they are >> reading a liar. > > We know Peter Olcott has lied in things that matter. However, I believe > his continual falsehoods are more a matter of delusion than mendacity. > As Mike Terry has said, OP's intellectual capacity is low. Calling him > a liar in virtually every post is, I think, unwarranted. Which is why I point out that he is a PATHOLOGICAL liar, that is a liar who lies because he doesn't understand the difference between truth and falsehood. He show evidence that this pathology is at least in part, self-inflicted, as he has deliberately chosen to not study the fields out of a fear of being "brainwashed" into their false-ideas (which just shows a funndamental lack of understanding on how logic works). > >>> It detracts from the substance of your posts, and makes >>> them, for me at least, thoroughly unpleasant to read. > >> You probably needn't read them. > > As I said, I mostly don't - which is a pity, since Richard Damon often > posts stuff worth reading. > >> As soon you find out that they repeat the same over and over, neither >> correcting their substantial errors nor improving their arguments you >> have read enough. > >> -- >> Mikko >