| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<bbOvLVaszxKOTWdC5gXr85BZuj0@jntp> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp Message-ID: <bbOvLVaszxKOTWdC5gXr85BZuj0@jntp> JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net JNTP-DataType: Article Subject: Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of the physics of your idiot guru References: <17fa988fc89c527f$104027$844270$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <_JYLNvLBI69jcFUh04gSAPBOO8U@jntp> <17faa49512686a50$121042$822353$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity JNTP-HashClient: SdwzE6-pdOccYzao8USWnx4zRag JNTP-ThreadID: 17fa988fc89c527f$104027$844270$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com JNTP-Uri: https://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=bbOvLVaszxKOTWdC5gXr85BZuj0@jntp User-Agent: Nemo/1.0 JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net Date: Wed, 02 Oct 24 13:16:20 +0000 Organization: Nemoweb JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/115.0 Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="21b58e961d0157c9c18526249011e260673fa78a"; logging-data="2024-10-02T13:16:20Z/9045112"; posting-account="190@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com" JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1 JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96 From: Python <python@not-formail.invalid> Bytes: 2554 Lines: 37 Le 02/10/2024 à 15:06, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : > W dniu 02.10.2024 o 14:13, Python pisze: >> Le 02/10/2024 à 11:25, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : >>> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second >>> As seen, the definition of second loved so >>> much to be invoked by relativistic morons - >>> wasn't valid in the time when their idiot guru >>> lived and mumbled. Up to 1960 it was ordinary >>> 1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics. >>> >>> >>> Now: an observer moving with c/2 wrt >>> solar system is measuring the length >>> of solar day. What is the result predicted >>> by the Einsteinian physics? >>> One prediction is - 99766. From the >>> postulates. The second prediction is - >>> 86400. From definition. >>> And similiarly with the prediction of >>> a measurement of a meridian. >>> >>> >>> Thank you for your attention, poor >>> relativistic fanatics, have a nice day. >> >> Already answered. > > Sure - with screaming "NOOOO!!!", > wild, idiotic assertions, insults and > slanders. Not at all. With sensible answers you are too stubborn and dumb to consider. > [snip screams, idiotic assertions and slanders]