Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor)
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: What is "uncertain" in quantum =?UTF-8?B?cGh5c2ljcz8=?=
Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 22:58:37 +0000
Organization: Rocksolid Light
Message-ID: <bba646c30bd1197a218e58e35ec11a31@www.novabbs.org>
References: <100d5cr$105b1$1@dont-email.me> <6e300872fb3df19ad9c3f95d746590fd@www.novabbs.org> <100hj0d$261bc$2@dont-email.me> <c4b1148b4b135af592659061cb310f31@www.novabbs.org> <100i1l7$28brh$1@dont-email.me> <00f4d7db30dfd71f3d2c92911f15015b@www.novabbs.org> <100jgur$2ldn1$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1365527"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="8Ljlg8xw5cAHatvjdHGGjEHKUx9ddlqxMwQzk4UFm4k";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$QGTnJ9pm8uzmPd8tzhOuheDuVWKNoI2OTp44EjPkGMZ6P8Gnj6FzC
X-Rslight-Posting-User: d6bc49351b0faa08a25d2b434d815198335a8b45
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 3727
Lines: 61

On Wed, 21 May 2025 3:23:07 +0000, x wrote:

> On 5/20/25 16:08, Bertitaylor wrote:
>> On Tue, 20 May 2025 13:55:51 +0000, Julio Di Egidio wrote:
>>
>>> On 20/05/2025 13:22, Bertitaylor wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 20 May 2025 9:45:49 +0000, x wrote:
>>>>> On 5/20/25 00:41, Bertitaylor wrote:
>>>>>> Why do you think the universe expands?
>>>>>
>>>>> I am not sure about that thought experiment concerning
>>>>> an infinitely old universe having the background of space
>>>>> gradually filling with stars if there was an infinite
>>>>> distance or time to look upon it.
>>>>
>>>> Idea is that the universe always was and always will be, of infinite
>>>> size. This goes against Genesis so idea is automatically outed by
>>>> Abrahamic minds to the corruption of science by wrong physics
>>>>>
>>>>> It seems feasible that the integral could add up to
>>>>> near zero as well as stars everywhere.
>>>>
>>>> Near zero density of the universe is not zero density, but enough to put
>>>> the show on constant motion.
>>>
>>> That makes a lot sense, especially more sense than the
>>> circularity of reasoning that I am finding all over the place.
>>>
>>>>> Anyway the Doppler effect is different from the photoelectric
>>>>> effect.
>>>>
>>>> Doppler effect shows half the galaxies are going away and half coming
>>>> towards us. Redshift, blueshift both happening. No edge found of the
>>>> universe. Only more galaxies.
>>>
>>> Indeed, also the problem of what evidence for what tampering.
>>> If nothing, it's embarrassing...
>>>
>>> -Julio
>>
>> Good, Arindam's physics throws out all confusion. It unites all forces
>> as electric; updates the laws of motion and chucks out the theories of
>> relativity and quantum.
>>
>> You can easily get the relevant links from searching in this newsgroup.
>
> You know with classic static electricity, a lot of positive charges
> like 'protons' would repel each other in a nucleus.
>
> You might need a 'strong force' to keep them in the nucleus regardless
> of the quantum nature of this 'strong force'.
>
> Then there might be neutrons and positrons or electrons.  It might be
> that the nature of the 'weak force' might not be as obvious as the
> 'strong force'.  It does seem feasible however that the 'strong force'
> might be different from static electricity.  Positive charges do repel
> each other.

Just read Arindam's original essay on the cause of gravity to find
exactly how it is a manifestation of electrostatics.

--