| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<bcd3d8cb722cb944088708db1a0d53bc@www.novabbs.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: will.dockery@gmail.com (W.Dockery) Newsgroups: alt.arts.poetry.comments,rec.arts.poems Subject: Re: My Father's House / gjd (for new comments) Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 02:10:06 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: <bcd3d8cb722cb944088708db1a0d53bc@www.novabbs.com> References: <97db0c3aeb33a7b97dc54cdfd5661e52@www.novabbs.com> <8449fc82c39b215c669a357d5ba5e1c7@www.novabbs.com> <ab63475112ba9a983e515d303320126a@www.novabbs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="3510398"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="Vf9CM7g99yqfGvzEHTw0bhrjcIfvzYBBhUuRma0rLuQ"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Rslight-Posting-User: acd0b3e3614eaa6f47211734e4cbca3bfd42bebc X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$NxLGNT/X6cQ2eGREVCD4Jet3bnvwXCL48nuQHfeGtV0UAqWIO1Nra X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Bytes: 7003 Lines: 138 On Sun, 9 Feb 2025 19:58:55 +0000, HarryLime wrote: > On Sun, 9 Feb 2025 18:36:08 +0000, Will Dockery wrote: > >> On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 19:31:54 +0000, George J. Dance wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 11:29:25 +0000, Will Dockery wrote: >>>> George J. Dance wrote: >>> >>>>> My Father's House >>>>> >>>>> This is my father's house, although >>>>> The man died thirteen years ago. >>>>> They said it would be quite all right >>>>> To take a drive to see it now. >>>>> >>>>> Dad laid those grey foundation blocks >>>>> And built the whole thing (from a box), >>>>> Toiling after each full day's work. >>>>> I helped, though I was only six. >>>>> >>>>> Look, here's the back door I would use >>>>> And here's where I'd remove my shoes >>>>> To enter; there I'd leave my things >>>>> And, when allowed, climb up these stairs. >>>>> >>>>> In this room I'd wash many a dish, >>>>> Gaze out this window, and I'd wish >>>>> To be so many other places. >>>>> (Wishy-washy? Oh, I guess!) >>>>> >>>>> Outside, the garden that he grew >>>>> Where I would work the summers through, >>>>> While watching my friends run and play >>>>> Mysterious games I never knew. >>>>> >>>>> That room's all changed; oh, where is it, >>>>> The one chair I was let to sit? >>>>> (For boys can be such filthy things.) >>>>> Which, the corner where boys were put? >>>>> >>>>> Oh ... down that hall there is a room >>>>> Where I'd be shut (as in a tomb) >>>>> After the meal, to make no noise, >>>>> To read or play alone, and then >>>>> >>>>> Lights out: in bed by nine each night, >>>>> Some nights wanting to pee with fright, >>>>> Face and pyjama bottoms down >>>>> As for my father's belt I'd wait. >>>>> >>>>> Oh, if I were a millionaire >>>>> I'd buy my father's house, and there >>>>> I'd build a bonfire, oh so high >>>>> Its flames would light up all the air. >>>>> >>>>> ~~ >>>>> George J. Dance >>>>> from Logos and other logoi, 2021 >>>> >>>> Here it is, MFH. >>> >>> Thank you for reposting this poem of mine, Will. While it's true that it >>> has been discussed a lot over the years, it also true that at least one >>> person wants to discuss it now; and this would be the appropriate place >>> to move those comments, rather than leaving them scattered all over the >>> group. So let's start with this one: >>> >>> On Mon, 3 Feb 2025 16:15:27 +0000, Michael Monkey Peabrain (MPP) aka >>> "HarryLime" wrote: >>>> On Mon, 3 Feb 2025 13:06:00 +0000, George J. Dance wrote: >>>>>> Why do you lie so much, George? >>>>>> (That's a rhetorical question, as you've already intimated that your >>>>>> pathological lying stems from you having been abused as a child.) >>>>> >>>>> No, Lying Michael: I have never said, or even "intimated" (!) that I was >>>>> pathological, lying, or >>>>> "abused as a child". >>> >>>> You wrote a "mostly autobiographical" poem detailing the abuses you >>>> suffered as a child, George. And you're demonstrating your pathological >>>> obsession with lying in your trio of denials, listed above. >>> https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article.php?id=15801&group=rec.arts.poems >>> >>> HarryLiar has manufactured yet another fake quote; I have never called >>> this poem "mostly autobiographical" or autobiographical in many ways. I >>> have distinctly told him in the past that, while some of the speaker's >>> memories were based on my own childhood experiences, not all of them >>> were; I was using them in a work of creative fiction, not an >>> autobiography of any kind. So he lied and made up a fake quote to >>> support his lie. >>> >>> The poem is meant to be a dramatic monolgue, in the style of Browning >>> (His "My Last Duchess" is a good example), meant to get inside the >>> psychology of a speaker or persona. The speaker may have experienced >>> his childhood as "abuse" - HarryLiar calls it that but the speaker >>> doesn't. The memories of it, though, have stayed on his mind, and he >>> wants to get rid of those memories (symbolized by burning down the house >>> at the end). >>> >>> It's deliberately left to the reader to decide if the speaker actually >>> had been abused by his father or not. I did structure it, for effect, >>> from the least to the most abusive-seeming experiences; from having to >>> use a back door and remove his shoes to enter the house, to doing >>> household chores, to doing garden work in the summertime, to not being >>> allowed to use some of the furniture, to having to stay inside alone at >>> night and be in bed early, to being subjected to corporal punishment. >>> Adding them together like that, it's easy enough to conclude that the >>> father had been abusive; but I'll point out that all of those events >>> were things children commonly experienced 50-60 years ago, and that none >>> of them were commonly considered abusive. >> >> As Karla Rogers often reminded us: >> >> "Try not to mistake the speaker in the poem with the writer of the >> poem." > > As I'd noted in my post, Karla's oft-quoted adage (oft-quoted by you, > that is), is simply incorrect. > > My previous post explains why: > > "In fact, Karla's oft-quoted adage aside, one can *never* fully separate > the two. > For instance, all of the characters in any author's fictional novel are > going to represent some aspect of the author. Every poem stems from its > author's imagination... regardless of what external persons and/or > events might have inspired it. Every literary work is similar to a > dream construct in that regard; and like a dream construct, can be > analyzed by a psychologist, a literary critic, or even the average > reader. Since "My Father's House" was based to a large extent on your > own childhood experiences, it literally begs for a psychoanalytical > reading." > > -- You dispute the wisdom of the mighty Karla Rogers? 😏