| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<bcfc1c5a30d87ec65328e93132675bb6@www.novabbs.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: Energy is for bunny-ahs (traders) Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 18:05:09 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: <bcfc1c5a30d87ec65328e93132675bb6@www.novabbs.com> References: <730c4a156bd268ae1f9342119eb1ff2e@www.novabbs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="498968"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="4CIDjmRjWbqC4EEN5EcU+HA+pIaOwwy51Z63DnRPIoA"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$i1MQcHbLMXe1vyuqiUo2S.09mJzgGQ6QX8Z7mgLEyZAK3t7P07X8a X-Rslight-Posting-User: d1111375bdddd1d0b42e6fbe96c9934b24d8a010 Bytes: 1489 Lines: 15 On Sun, 24 Nov 2024 9:14:02 +0000, Bertietaylor wrote: > Physics texts should avoid the word "energy" as much as possible. > > It is an unscientific term as it is so volatile and relative. > > Besides the so called law of conservation of energy is nonsense as shown > by the phenomenon of radioactivity. Explaining that with e=mcc is even > more nonsense. > > High time the world quitted bad physics and followed Arindam's physics > that updates Newton and rejects Einstein. > > Bertietaylor Up Arindam Down Einstein!