Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<be3r3jhr1kf9n1cdsbik5ejsuso7c3pmmk@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: John Savard <quadibloc@servername.invalid> Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Oops (Concertina II Going Around in Circles) Date: Thu, 09 May 2024 21:02:51 -0600 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 15 Message-ID: <be3r3jhr1kf9n1cdsbik5ejsuso7c3pmmk@4ax.com> References: <ofeq3j9ni63e7tmccf2qbkb9t0naui44ei@4ax.com> <memo.20240510001905.16164S@jgd.cix.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 05:02:52 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4149b5fac129358ff59df23316899a9b"; logging-data="1201536"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/h3jSGntWvyShbFBwStGBHlqdghH/dhd0=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:gL3KngJVKaNIeX1/dlZgfP6rEQk= X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 3.3/32.846 Bytes: 1528 On Fri, 10 May 2024 00:19 +0100 (BST), jgd@cix.co.uk (John Dallman) wrote: >Not that justified the costs of implementing such a huge instruction set. Well, having a huge instruction set defined and implementing all of it are two different things. Look at x86, how MMX got replaced by SSE which got replaced by AVX. So if one is going to include instructions that will later become obsolete, and be replaced by other instructions, not re-using the same opcodes helps with upwards compatibility. John Savard