Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2024 16:25:56 +0000
Subject: Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <23387e561af5e3d769b94ab9ddc5f74b@www.novabbs.com>
 <7dfa7214e108991221d9b7115961ca87@www.novabbs.com>
 <AqOcnXv9t9jTwkP7nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <a407badbce7d5666f11edf8be6da4c9b@www.novabbs.com>
 <beScnQyJ8qNivUL7nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com>
From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2024 09:25:59 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <beScnQyJ8qNivUL7nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <beScnQ6J8qMJvEL7nZ2dnZfqnPTYh4kr@giganews.com>
Lines: 105
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-dJ7MYYm7cz338/iTkVGankFtzEeMvxR+xTGbkOhjvyf2qihRATtbUb6ZbcgqBvXdIXw3Si+w9BWyoXt!lrM7wVlW/KbbTCCubZQSnF1g/VffXrbLATUwiP8WnRhw71MJw8f6HmXkzaN7vUGBmwnSV07JhgmJ!1Q==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 6490

On 09/09/2024 09:23 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
> On 09/08/2024 11:00 PM, rhertz wrote:
>> He didn´t think nothing first. Study MORE, in particular the November
>> 1915 paper on Mercury problem.
>>
>> FIRST AT ALL: It wasn't Einstein who thought about spacetime bending and
>> twisting due to heavy gravitational masses. It was Marcel Grossman, in
>> 1913, while developing Entwurf I. Einstein didn't know shit about that
>> new mathematics, based on absolute differential geometry. The adoption
>> of such concept came MANY YEARS AFTER 1915, by the hand of many other
>> MATHEMATICIANS AND ROGUE PHYSICISTS.
>>
>> Points to be made CRISTAL CLEAR:
>>
>> 1) The solution of Mercury's problem didn't involve ANY CONCEPT OF
>> SPACETIME. Not even the handling of Hilbert's Field Equations, which
>> Einstein appropriated in 1915. Such solution ELIMINATED the time
>> variable, as it was FIXED using gravitational potential as the 4th.
>> coordinate. TIME (as flowing while Mercury was orbiting was dismissed.
>> Instead, calculations were made over an ENTIRE REVOLUTION around the
>> Sun). Only at the end, the PERIOD was introduced by using the 2nd.
>> Kepler's Law.
>>
>> 3) The problem was managed by his proposal of a NEWTONIAN law of kinetic
>> + potential energy, like it was used to calculate Newtonian orbits:
>> K+U=E. Once he got the analytical expression of a Newtonian orbit, he
>> HACKED the equation by introducing a OBSCURE MODIFICATION of the
>> Newtonian potential (Eq. 7c). He replaced, without any substantiation U=
>> -GM/r  (Newton) by U= -GM (1+L^2/r^2). This FRAUDULENT CHANGE allowed to
>> transform a quadratic polynomial (pure Newton) into a cubic polynomial,
>> in the expression of (dx/d@)^2. This trick, by solving the integral of
>> d@ from perihelion to aphelion, provided a small difference over PHI,
>> and that was all.
>>
>> 4) IN NO CASE the space bending was used, as the calculations were based
>> on a flat spatial orbit around the Sun, following a CLASSICAL Newtonian
>> approach.
>>
>> 5) All the crap about matter bending space and energy dictating how came
>> MANY YEARS AFTER 1915, by CORRUPT SOLD OUT SCHOLARS, who made a healthy
>> living by profiting about the infinite MATHEMATICAL SOLUTIONS (not
>> PHYSICALS) that the complexity of GR allowed. Of the hundred of
>> solutions found in the decades to come, almost ALL OF THEM were
>> dismissed, because it had no any possible physical meaning in order to
>> support GR.
>>
>> BECAUSE MATHEMATICS IS NOT PHYSICS, AND GR MATHEMATICS IS A HUGE SCAM
>> POPULARIZED BY PEOPLE WITHOUT MORAL AND ETHICS. THEY JUST FOUND AN EASY
>> WAY TO MAKE A LIVING PLAYING WITH GR, CREATING FANTASY WORLDS THAT WORTH
>> NOTHING.
>>
>> READ MORE AND STUDY MORE, FYLANSSON.
>
> Yeah, I'll try.
>
> The other day I'm reading in the World Fact Book of 1846 that Faraday
> discovered a "Magnetization of Light" according to which polarization
> in effect is a pretty simple table-top experiment, as in according to
> something like "Faraday rotations".
>
> Then the old "ether" theory is sort of wrapped as new these days as
> yon "aether" theory, as with regards to the Equivalence Principle
> (of acceleration motively and acceleration gravitationally) as with
> regards to that it's really rather terrestrial.
>
> So, we lionize Einstein and not just because of the conceptual
> "Fourth Dimension" separating the strength of science from the
> strength of theory so that there's hope, and besides the fact
> that something like e = mc^2 is just the first term of the Taylor
> series of K.E. kinetic energy, and in the surrounds of Kelvin and
> Rayleigh and Young and Millikan with regards to Fresnel and Huygens
> and later Broglie and Bohm, about the "success" of relativity and
> the "success" of quantum mechanics, where the quotes only mean
> "not unqualified", and particularly as with regards to Einstein's
> later and wiser "Out of My Later Years" where he defines that in
> Relativity that "SR is local" and "GR is first", while working on
> what's required of the mathematical theory to provide the
> super-classical extra-standard, of which he wasn't un-aware,
> and even the basic notions for classical mechanics, of the
> zero'eth laws as with regards to on the one side "absement"
> as before displacement, and on the other, the infinitely-many
> higher orders of acceleration in any change of motion, mathematically.
>
>
> Then you're at your leisure to bring him down, yet only what
> matters is to bring something better, up.
>
>
> The other day some article was like "GR and QM unified", and
> it's like, I see you've log-normaled your g-2 and slanted your bias.
>
> I try learning, https://www.youtube.com/@rossfinlayson .
>
>
>

There's also the cosmological constant, vanishing yet non-zero,
where today's sky survey thoroughly establishes "space-time is flat",
so it's vanishing, while, there's gravity and all, so non-zero.

Extra-classical, super-standard, ....

It's broke? Fix it.