Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <bigu1zNUD9n8JIWm2zHpTNzxgBQ@jntp>
JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Getting there at last...
References: <1HWE6H1jV8YTvxfaaL7fnCCcpe8@jntp> <urobnk$3v1g$1@dont-email.me> <l4ak2fF7mb7U1@mid.individual.net>
 <1bcd63e24f9d1f35a1aa7af1b44091d2@www.novabbs.org> <l67dnaFikkfU1@mid.individual.net>
 <b6043cf438f884321bf1b6aed55f9871@www.novabbs.org> <9YCpfbWayDDTVrmI9Yye1LKiThs@jntp> <l6kfsfFjqknU2@mid.individual.net>
 <WuhuOl-fQu3J7ho5vcxwxFwmlEQ@jntp> <l6puenFeh5pU1@mid.individual.net>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math
JNTP-HashClient: 5KyVaQf4F-3-bkjtdw9PxZAgcRE
JNTP-ThreadID: 5ipMllmo3ZDdVjvYIsvl1ofrDVs
JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=bigu1zNUD9n8JIWm2zHpTNzxgBQ@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a
JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 24 10:38:33 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/121.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/121.0.0.0
Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="601f4a4a60dc6043f0c3ab83656fd85fb6bc327d"; logging-data="2024-03-30T10:38:33Z/8798826"; posting-account="219@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com>
Bytes: 9703
Lines: 220

Le 30/03/2024 à 18:48, Thomas Heger a écrit :
> Am 28.03.2024 um 08:09 schrieb Arindam Banerjee:
> 
>>>
>>> Maybe you like my 'book'
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>>> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Ur3_giuk2l439fxUa8QHX4wTDxBEaM6lOlgVUa0cFU4/edit?usp=sharing
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> TH
>>
>>  From your book, the following quote
>> ***
>> This project was started as a search for the connection between QM and
>> GR. The connection was hypothesized and assumed to exist (without
>> knowing it's specific features), since nature has to be understood as an
>> undivided system. So all theories should describe the same world, but
>> possibly different aspects. Spacetime is a physical system, hence should
>> be build out of 'elements' (what are the 'building blocks'). ***
>>
>> Any connection between two theoretical (conjectural, impractical as yet)
>> notions as QM and GR must necessarily be theoretical as well.
> 
> Sure.
> 
> If you try to find a way between to spots (let's call them 'QM' and 
> 'GR'), you need to assume, those spots do in fact exist.
> 
> It's not the duty of the pathfinder, to prove the existence of the two 
> endpoints of the way found.
> 
> If there is actually nothing at these positions, it's actually not his 
> fault.
> 
>> In theory, the Moon is green cheese with cows jumping over it.
> 
> No, not really. At least I've never heard of such a theory.
> 
>> People were burnt to death for not believing that the stars moved in
>> crystal spheres, and the stars were holes in those spheres to let
>> heavenly light in.
> 
> Well, that's not quite true, neither.
> 
> Unfortunately, the catholic church had killed several scientists in the 
> middle ages, but not because of their discoveries, but because they were 
> questioning the authority of the church.
> 
> That authority was meant to be absolute and ANY disobedience could be 
> punished by death.
> 
> This has changed significantly and today the pope does not intervene in 
> physics anymore.
> 
>>
>> The justification for QM and GR as practical let alone scientific is not
>> there.
> 
> Well, yes, because that was NOT my topic.
> 
>> While there is charm in seeing the moon as green cheese with cows
>> jumping around it, and there is profit in all the heaven stuff, I see
>> neither pleasure nor profit from QM and GR, save for the careerists and
>> their dupes blown by math mumbo-jumbo. I know this is the most powerful
>> nonsense ever to be globally accepted, in our times, and that deserves
>> respect.
> 
> You may rightfully critizise QM and GR, and in a way I would understand 
> you, but this was not the subject of my 'book'.
> 
>> Those really into physics better study my videos and texts relating to
>> physics. The US Navy, I find, has appropriated my new design rail gun
>> for their ships. The Chinese are using a version of that to launch their
>> warplanes from navy carriers. Facebook is so useful, to present new
>> discoveries and inventions, and see how they get stolen.
> 
> You invented the railgun? ? ? ? 

Yes, I invented a new design railgun, where the bullet is heavy, 
perpendicular to the rails, and the voltage is low. Overall, this design 
is 10-100 more efficient than the earlier rail guns of the US as shown in 
their pre 2015 videos. So it is practical and has been known since my 
first paper on it in 2013. I showed that to my PhD supervisor in 2015, and 
I suspect that it was transmitted to the relevant people from that time. 
In 2017 I published the details of the invention in a series of youtube 
videos. 

My idea behind my PhD work (btw I am not a PhD as in the final viva they 
said I had not made a working model of a rail gun, which was not what my 
supervisor had been saying) was to show that the Lorentz force 
accelerating the bullet had no ELECTRICAL reaction.  (Since I have used a 
rolling bullet/armature in my videos, there is apparently some reaction 
but that is mechanical, due to the treadmill effect.) My detailed analysis 
shows inertia violation.  

Which means, outing inertia as a sacred principle, and consequently outing 
entropy, laws of thermodynamics, quantum, relativity, big bang, finite 
expanding universe, etc. In short, upgrading Newton and dismissing 
Einstein.  Mathematically, e=0.5mVV(N-k)N and c(V)=c+V, the former meaning 
that energy is constantly created and destroyed in our infinite universe 
and the latter showing the Doppler effect cause.

That led to my finding the cause of gravity, novas and supernovas. 

Well, I am glad that the US has appropriated my new design for the rail 
gun, and the Chinese too have used it to launch aircraft. Both, very 
recently.  I have no doubt that commercial aircraft too will take off with 
such rail gun launches, requiring short take off lengths. Just a few 
million amps going down the belly of the craft, providing extraordinary 
force.

All the above information detailed in the links below:

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee

The violation of inertia with a new design rail gun in motor mode
Arindam Banerjee,
HTN Research Pty Ltd. Melbourne
10 Nov 2023
(All rights reserved)

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/VtFeGAkIABg/m/CLPzLRElAwAJ

***

Experiments (2022) showing my invention of a new kind of rail gun
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYtyOMbgiZ0

Which is improved upon in, and its potential for ejecting matter into near 
space , and horizontal tunneling shown in
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6pjy0Wvujs&t=19s

and the following shows how a new class of linear motor violating inertia 
can be developed by arresting the momentum of the armature and imparting 
that to the whole system, giving it an increased velocity
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=idsIuzEajTc&t=2s

*****

Introduction to "A New Look Towards the Principles of Motion"
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/1wmee5C8mFs/kJMPdnFkAwAJ

Section 1
Linear Motion, Momentum, Force, Energy, Internal Force Engines, and the 
design of Interstellar Spacecraft
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/GbpQC3a2d1Q/jSXQeb9kAwAJ

Section 1 (contd.)
Linear Motion, Momentum, Force, Energy, Internal Force Engines, and the 
design of Interstellar Spacecraft
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/P9ZiinIDhHU/ZtMQVyliBQAJ

Section 2
The Creation and Destruction of Energy
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/wY6_9V8ucSY/3nnJQk9iBQAJ

Section 3
The Structure of Heavenly Bodies
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/8jH-SQIFFDo/O1jn3HpiBQAJ

Section 4
The Nature of Explosion
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/7TkOVZigFHg/uv43_aZiBQAJ

Section 5
The forces involved in rotational motion
========== REMAINDER OF ARTICLE TRUNCATED ==========