Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Catrike Ryder <Soloman@old.bikers.org>
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Subject: Re: About argument
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2025 16:51:32 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 60
Message-ID: <bke8vjtgl7655lloh2ags99ne3a9klqsca@4ax.com>
References: <vsrruq$2rv7o$4@dont-email.me> <3c93vj9bo2c9lamtolompnqo59k993ac6j@4ax.com> <vssici$3k80b$1@dont-email.me> <m5famaFirvdU1@mid.individual.net> <ktt4vjpr5212ljut1tolkfdha7oqvs1gdp@4ax.com> <kac8vj55c7plevlfdk4e7956os7eai8247@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2025 22:51:34 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9bba9f8f804531e5f97bc68f8890dafd";
	logging-data="696279"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+JTgkO7q7zjt627E+ccP9ql2HZ3KzoE34="
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Cancel-Lock: sha1:fxnOmrbaGHKzE5I+CxpyopIAZxE=
Bytes: 3389

On Mon, 07 Apr 2025 17:13:19 -0300, Shadow <Sh@dow.br> wrote:

>On Sun, 06 Apr 2025 19:58:50 +0700, John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On 6 Apr 2025 12:34:18 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Mark J cleary <mcleary08@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>> On 4/5/2025 4:59 PM, Shadow wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 13:14:48 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> At least here on RBT we do beat a subject to death with
>>>>>> keyboards, leaving no aspect of any discussion unturned.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Elsewhere, those who fail to form compelling argument just
>>>>>> give up and throw punches:
>>>>> 
>>>>> To be fair, you can't argue with crazy.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> https://nypost.com/2025/04/05/us-news/pro-life-activist-recalls-moment-she-was-punched-during-harlem-interview/
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'm interested in knowing if it worked. Did the pro-lifer
>>>>> suddenly start caring about people AFTER they were born?
>>>>> Imagine less un-loved and abandoned children. Surely a plus?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> with photos
>>>>> 
>>>>> More interested in psych evaluations than photos...
>>>>> []'s
>>>> Interesting way to put it as if the pro-life person did not somehow care 
>>>> for people already. The act of life and the making of life is sacred. 
>>>> All human life is sacred in that it is made in the image and likeness of 
>>>> God. I am all pro-life there is nothing else as important since without 
>>>> life there is nothing.
>>>> 
>>>
>>>Without wishing to speak for Shadow, it’s the single issue aspect of it, ie
>>>do they want to help or support family with kids or medical issues and so
>>>on?
>>>
>>>Let alone the fact that it’s wishing to intervene (largely men would seem)
>>>what is women’s rights, and not one taken lightly it’s a horrible thing to
>>>go through I’m told.
>>>
>>>Roger Merriman
>>
>>What's horrifying?
>
>	The decision to do an abortion because you don't think your
>child is going to get a chance to live happily.
>	I know dozens of women who have had abortions, and almost all
>do not regret it. But it's a tough call.
>	[]'s

On the other hand I know lots of women who did not have an abortion
and none of them regret it.

--
C'est bon
Soloman