| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<bpeenj5cqdb8m2li7b07giula07f90rfv9@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail From: Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off> Newsgroups: talk.origins Subject: Re: Is Darwinism devolving? Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2025 18:22:22 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 61 Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org Message-ID: <bpeenj5cqdb8m2li7b07giula07f90rfv9@4ax.com> References: <vl73gr$3hkjv$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89"; logging-data="76979"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org" User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.20.32.1218 To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:hXgCmpWUB7tWJcIjUFdu33rWFMk= Return-Path: <news@eternal-september.org> X-Original-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org Delivered-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org id 36795229782; Thu, 02 Jan 2025 20:22:35 -0500 (EST) by beagle.ediacara.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2BBA229765 for <talk-origins@ediacara.org>; Thu, 02 Jan 2025 20:22:32 -0500 (EST) by pi-dach.dorfdsl.de (8.18.1/8.18.1/Debian-6~bpo12+1) with ESMTPS id 5031MP5p1209858 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Fri, 3 Jan 2025 02:22:26 +0100 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.eternal-september.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F14A5FD57 for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Fri, 3 Jan 2025 01:22:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: name/2F14A5FD57; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=buzz.off id 8C7B6DC01A9; Fri, 3 Jan 2025 02:22:23 +0100 (CET) X-Injection-Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2025 02:22:23 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX1+YbNnHhaPcLpeamPHZfIR7OWBXoqajJ0VESCIz2KG2RWETQZq7OTAI HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_IN_WELCOMELIST,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 smtp.eternal-september.org On Thu, 2 Jan 2025 16:21:16 -0600, the following appeared in talk.origins, posted by RonO <rokimoto557@gmail.com>: >https://evolutionnews.org/2024/12/no-2-story-of-2024-darwinists-devolve/ > >What is the "Darwinism" that West claims is devolving? > Since "devolve" is a null concept coined by those who believe, incorrectly, that evolution has a direction beyond survival and reproduction in the environment as it exists, does it matter what he claims? > >There was an initial rise for the ID creationist scam, but then it fell >on it's face and they started running a stupid bait and switch scam on >their supporters over 2 decades ago. ID perps like Nelson started >admitting that the ID science never existed, but that they were working >on developing some. If any ID science had been accomplished with >respect to the Top Six, Nelson would have likely quit the ID scam. None >of the Top Six god-of-the-gaps "evidence" supports YEC. After the bait >and switch started to go down Berlinski claimed that he had never >supported the ID scam, and he likely had not because all he ever did was >put up the junk that had failed the scientific creationist, and had >never supported Behe's IC or Dembski's junk. These are the type of >fellows that are still fellows of the ID scam unit. > >Brian Miller now makes the list of prominent defenders of the ID scam. >Miller is supposed to have a PhD in physics, but he should be known on >TO as the ID perp that did not like the original list of the Top Six. >Miller supported Sewell's modified list, but removed the Big Bang from >Sewell's list. What does it say when a physics PhD does not want the >Big Bang on the list of the best evidence for ID? > >The YEC scientific creationists used to use the Big Bang. It was part >of the Gish Gallop and is up at the planetarium at the AIG's creation >museum, but it never was anything that the YEC wanted to deal with in an >honest and straightforward manner. It is one of the science topics >along with evolution that the creationists have wanted to remove from >the science standards in states like Texas, and Oklahoma. The Kansas >creationists succeeded in temporarily removing the Big Band and >biological evolution from their state science standards back in 1999, >but the other states never did what they wanted to do. > >Were Francis Collins and Ken Miller ever Darwinists? These two are >Christians that believe in an interactive God. They were against ID >because it was just a dishonest creationist scam. They believe that >nature is God's creation. They just understand that life has evolved on >this planet for billions of years. They do not reject their God's >involvement, they just acknowledge that the ID scam is basically a scam >and bad science. > >Ron Okimoto > -- Bob C. "The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, is not 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'" - Isaac Asimov