Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<brfekjtio2i4v5cnl68lllktjs9qmq6gbj@4ax.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 15:53:50 +0000
From: Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Ubuntu
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 10:53:49 -0500
Message-ID: <brfekjtio2i4v5cnl68lllktjs9qmq6gbj@4ax.com>
References: <lql3clFsia4U1@mid.individual.net> <vi4pth$3gius$1@dont-email.me> <qq0ckj9v3n0uo5vs91i9c86b0puhslr7hs@4ax.com> <vi57qi$3iv23$1@dont-email.me> <67dckjd1fbbv4aav4kp6842rakbo2h1mag@4ax.com> <vi5fct$3kgo3$1@dont-email.me> <2jgckjtaunuajukcoratab544j39o2vsfo@4ax.com> <vi7en1$21kk$3@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
OS: Debian 12, with Wine 9.0 for WinAPI
Lines: 83
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-XObJ6Ep4NF/rMa0pYwPFkC7sS0xdIk9Z/0Y4IYnAWl9XNxLXjKMyzXwIuZzRb64XHMsoBqSZbv+MM3H!PN+EAIpFocWWHksSho/bBmsnmypOKKptlQfPxexXC+Z4VToI6ZXcA8LZmIiqFTZSBjdYfrWP
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 4105

DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:

>>>>> Stallman got so mad at a printer that he devoted the rest of his life to
>>>>> demanding everyone's code.
>>>>
>>>> What printer?  Is this a real story, or just an expression of
>>>> Stallman's philosophy with a euphemism?
>>>
>>> https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/201cthe-printer-story201d-redux-a-testimonial-about-the-injustice-of-proprietary-firmware
>> 
>> Would you suggest we'd be better off relying on M$ et al, then? 'Cause
>> it'd be a tough sell, to me, when I see how they fucked over millions
>> of Win10 users, in their Win11 beta test, culminating in 20H2 and
>> later builds.  In 2019, Win10 turned into bug-infested beta crud,
>> publicly forced on victims, and then in 2020-2021 it was simply a
>> preview of Win11, bloated to a point it ran like ass on older systems.
>
>You're greatly exaggerating.  Win11 runs as well as Win10 on older systems.


Heh, "as well as" meaning not well at all, yeah, maybe.  Current Win10
is just Win11 Light.


>> This is the bullshit you praise.  
>
>Above GuhNoo crapware?  Of course.
>
>But, to be fair, I haven't installed a full distro to bare metal in a 
>long time - like 2+ years.  So hopefully there are significant improvements.


There is some truth to Winblows software being supreme.  I don't deny
it.  But to require their OS, is a deal-breaker.


>> And they're doing just as much evil
>> with Win11, which is what prompted me to stop using it.  
>
>What 'evil' are you referring to?


Bloat^N.


>> You are more
>> than welcome to the product key I gave you, for any useful purpose you
>> find for it, if you haven't yet.  I don't want it back.  
>
>If you change your mind, I haven't given it away.


Trust me, I wouldn't have given it to you in the first place, if there
were a chance I'd change my mind.  I paid $200 for it.  But that's a
write-off, now, because I have no purpose for it, not even a VM.
Please do use it.


>> I will not disgrace my precious computer with M$, again.
>
>You already did, Gollum.  The minute you installed Wine you turned your 
>GuhNoo crapbox into a half-ass Windows machine, and admitted Linux isn't 
>fit for its purpose.


I run Forte Agent and EncSpot under Wine, yeah, big deal.  It's still
a Linux machine.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.