Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: fir <fir@grunge.pl>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: on named blocks concept
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2024 18:01:26 +0100
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <c35a251488ba0723a2ab4b985bc416778529cd9b@i2pn2.org>
References: <4b9a47d628677882c26b2518a78571043ef1bdb9@i2pn2.org> <vggdhl$27v1j$1@dont-email.me> <vggecf$27v1j$2@dont-email.me> <672BC788.6030100@grunge.pl> <vgi5fm$2k8kb$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <672CE2D9.1070206@grunge.pl> <vgio9r$2nfig$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 17:01:29 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1397241"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="+ydHcGjgSeBt3Wz3WTfKefUptpAWaXduqfw5xdfsuS0";
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:27.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/27.0 SeaMonkey/2.24
In-Reply-To: <vgio9r$2nfig$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2232
Lines: 41

Bonita Montero wrote:
> Am 07.11.2024 um 16:55 schrieb fir:
>
>> c++ has so many structural errors it makes it sh*t
>> (overaly all c++ is structural errors .. prbably one and only
>> thing interesting in c++ is operator overloading but it also
>> is badly done ofc)
>
> What do you consider as a "structural error" with C++ ?
>

many things there are simply idiotic

liek for exampe concept of suntypes and sueprtypes

when for example you got some entity that

some {
sing(); swim(); fly(); }

the subtypes are things that
1{sing(); }
2 { swim();
3 { fly();}
4 {sing(); swim(); }
5 { swim(), fly()} ;
6 { sing(); fly();}

and supertype is  {
sing(); swim(); fly(); + do more}

not that idiotism of c++

also oop is hevily idiotoc ehen in normal languege you
can use and connect entities (just by putting them in visibility) 
without all that idiotic pointers

thsi i call syructural errors becouse you can do things in normal
structurally correct way in c++ this is total idiotism in that place