Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<c463fa40bd9ebe67a28a3f67fbe4bd0d@www.novabbs.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of The Shit
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2024 20:46:54 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <c463fa40bd9ebe67a28a3f67fbe4bd0d@www.novabbs.com>
References: <17ee15afea6b29a3$410850$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <ad841da0a6ecd1268af33e012b996cd3@www.novabbs.com> <17f0447be1dca708$639122$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <ac8e79f3bfccf996ed94acec6c9d056d@www.novabbs.com> <17f04b720f77a302$639131$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <e4c869edcf7644d2982936e78ff344ac@www.novabbs.com> <17f04f0aa442b204$602281$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <fefc23dfe9b6c853e4f260e6f9acc2f1@www.novabbs.com> <17f0660d33597e0a$609532$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <ecc1cbf0f484e237b82d312335a771c3@www.novabbs.com> <17f0863c3f05fd66$618168$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <c67327925ea2a5ab9e8ae90361e50c2e@www.novabbs.com> <17f0b681b393b95e$625687$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <3ed9d78af41ee6880cf864a02867213a@www.novabbs.com> <17f0d033eac8edc8$659867$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="400429"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="p+/k+WRPC4XqxRx3JUZcWF5fRnK/u/hzv6aL21GRPZM";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$Xfk8m6WsiGbLs0uA4b7kae3CPOSrn5Qx7mJpEjsXdoDlTaz5V6HIS
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 47dad9ee83da8658a9a980eb24d2d25075d9b155
Bytes: 4602
Lines: 84

On Sat, 31 Aug 2024 12:32:58 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
> W dniu 31.08.2024 o 13:52, gharnagel pisze:
> >
> > Wozzie's "thesis" is a concocted fantasy.  His claim
> > that relativity is inconsistent is based on ridiculous
> > assertions (1) that the "definition" of a day (84600
> > seconds) applies to the entire universe, (2) that
> > relativity is false because it predicts that an observer
> > moving at c/2 will measure a day on earth as 99766
> > seconds
>
> Harrie is impudently lying.

So Wozniak has this serious mental problem because he
thinks that anyone who disagrees with him is lying:

"Clinical paranoia is a rare mental health condition
in which you believe that others are unfair, lying,
or actively trying to harm you"

when they could have misunderstood him.  Or, which is
the case here, that Wozniak doesn't understand the
implications of his claim:

"an observer moving with c/2 wrt solar system is
measuring the length of solar day. What is the
result predicted by the Einsteinian physics?
One prediction is - 99766. From the postulates.
The second prediction is - 86400. From definition."

So "(1) that the "definition" of a day (84600
seconds) applies to the entire universe" implies
that Wozniak believes that the moving observer
should measure 86400 seconds, too.

As for (2) that relativity is false because it
predicts that an observer moving at c/2 will
measure a day on earth as 99766 seconds
(according to relativity) is also his claim.

> Like always.
> I didn't make any of  these claims.

So Wozniak is lying that he didn't effectively make
claims (1) and (2).

> > and (3) that copious experimental evidence
> > supporting relativity is fabricated by lying
> > scientists.
>
> At least this one is true.

As are all three.

> Of course, youhaven't fabricate these experiments,
> but you have for sure fabricated the assertions
> that they are  kind of "evidence"

Wozniak hasn't denied that he definitely smeared
hundreds of honest scientists claiming they lied
about their experimental results.  That puts him
squarely in the paranoia classification.

And anyone with brains enough to connect dots
understands that the experimental evidence fully
confirms that what relativity predicts what the
moving observer will measure is supported by
said evidence.  That Wozniak can't, or refuses
to, connect those dots says everything about him
and nothing about relativity.

> for the self-denying mumble of your idiot
> guru.

Wozniak continues to insult, slander and lie
because of his paranoia.

> With your mad lies you've lost any norms,
> you're even insisting that ordinary maps
> are denying basic mathematics.

Wozniak is projecting his own abnormalities
on others, refusing to take responsibility
for his own mental health.