Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<c7939c87f06ef7dfe1ad490a68bf3e01a5165df8@i2pn2.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: joes <noreply@example.org> Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: Replacement of Cardinality Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2024 17:42:33 -0000 (UTC) Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <c7939c87f06ef7dfe1ad490a68bf3e01a5165df8@i2pn2.org> References: <hsRF8g6ZiIZRPFaWbZaL2jR1IiU@jntp> <P04FAosjolyjDfgV0JPXWx1mF6o@jntp> <40165884-df8f-4614-8644-9161d72fd1cb@att.net> <-qUZ96ARwcjh9QPfyWRnijjNwoY@jntp> <6b837540-3d9a-4b8e-9a70-88d52e81a1a4@att.net> <xQQT0K_Q_k2FbMcCUXF8j3CEg84@jntp> <9822f5da-d61e-44ba-9d70-2850da971b42@att.net> <p36L63dXamDAkHDhkZhDKqx-h-o@jntp> <d8bbe664-a601-4590-9a7f-d5312b4dae54@att.net> <v8j55c$2u09m$2@dont-email.me> <w2KNEc6WpgYmvVtoH_VZTRkLnUg@jntp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2024 17:42:33 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="1343421"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM"; User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Bytes: 2131 Lines: 18 Am Sat, 03 Aug 2024 14:25:03 +0000 schrieb WM: > Le 02/08/2024 à 19:31, Moebius a écrit : >> For each and every of these points [here referred to with the variable >> "x"]: NUF(x) = ℵ₀ . > I recognized lately that you use the wrong definition of NUF. It is the definition you have previously used. > Here is the correct definition: > There exist NUF(x) unit fractions u, such that for all y >= x: u < y. > Note that the order is ∃ u ∀ y. You are specifying an exact number, not only at least one. > NUF(x) = ℵ₀ for all x > 0 is wrong. NUF(x) = 1 for all x > 0 already is > wrong since there is no unit fraction smaller than all unit fractions. New sig. > ℵ₀ unit fractions need ℵ₀*2ℵ₀ points above zero. -- Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math: It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.