Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<c7GcnV4xqod8GKT6nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@earthlink.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2024 05:57:53 +0000
Subject: Re: The joy of octal
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
References: <vgns2aqlhq@dont-email.me> <20241111090306.0000385d@gmail.com>
 <vgtr5s5ph3@dont-email.me>
 <70ac3933f2b6e0f3539c739acc5a792d@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>
 <UKScnT53YMTJYqv6nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
 <lppi68FktfdU1@mid.individual.net> <slrnvjfbql.c11m.wookie@aspen.localdomain>
 <yXmdnVlrO4CmuqX6nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
 <87a5dzw9jb.fsf@eder.anydns.info> <vhaapn$21vd$2@dont-email.me>
From: "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net>
Organization: wokiesux
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2024 00:57:53 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.13.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <vhaapn$21vd$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <c7GcnV4xqod8GKT6nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@earthlink.com>
Lines: 15
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 99.101.150.97
X-Trace: sv3-n529zXqdwYUI/NU95eaANoiLZM1zYujV4zH0aZldfwEOjRx96h5BSFM4/Wl8Eol6sjVDkNEChLa5r+3!u0vW2RsbGBnWs+lwBP8aVfNVzaBb/xL87HiCYe8K2n1cZZtzKI0zXjF8eBpU//ypeK+WMeF0CK80!nfCplb2Co8PqaXABXNMh
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 2114

On 11/16/24 9:38 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> On 16/11/2024 14:14, Andreas Eder wrote:
>> On Sa 16 Nov 2024 at 00:01, "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> wrote:
>>
>>>    As for terminals, I liked the Textronics 4000
>>>    series a lot more. For text + simple graphs
>>>    vector really was faster/sharper than bitmap ...
>>>    at least back in the low-bandwidth day.
>>
>> It is Tektronix you mean, not Textronics isn't it?

   Yea, yea ... it's one of those words I *always*
   mis-spell. Dunno why  :-)

   But they WERE really good terminals ...