Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<c7pcuk-6aua.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: do you believe we can quantize gravity? Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2024 06:36:14 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 26 Message-ID: <c7pcuk-6aua.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> References: <j9oiptyjxgxi$.dlg@tomato.potato> <4e36753b-0086-f154-ff9f-9569905d4d03@ichigo.kinoko.kuri> <8a2fec3afd134f31003049fa8aa4d201@www.novabbs.com> <j9p3uk-1isg2.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <e8c2adfd5adcc814df0a29c26f68f3d9@www.novabbs.com> <09n8uk-v4h6.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <d641367af84e80efbc3322286f2d7660@www.novabbs.com> <hn29uk-cap6.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <49bb9bb5d3ec5f2fb1964f5b414deb4d@www.novabbs.com> <tm8buk-0d29.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <233ba5ea053b6bb89dcc4861a797b025@www.novabbs.com> Injection-Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2024 15:46:07 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c67ae4615dcacbdd5a99d0ae46d45525"; logging-data="4103317"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18How8kWxkvuOYE2Dj9k5Tc" User-Agent: tin/2.6.2-20220130 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.0-124-lowlatency (x86_64)) Cancel-Lock: sha1:0hn4nOGaNywgO3wDIoORlDn7rDE= Bytes: 2362 Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: > On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 23:48:15 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: > >> Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >>> On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 3:53:55 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: >>> >>>> Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >>>>> You are incapable of comprehension, Penisnino. >>>> >>>> You said your device has 1000 times better efficiency while I pointed >>>> out that exiting devices have about 50% efficiency, >>> >>> Idiot you have no clue about engineering. There are many parameters >>> related to efficiency not just making up figures on the fly as you did. >> >> Irrelevant drivel. Efficiency can be trivially measured, > > No it can't fool. You are making up figures on the fly with no basis > whatsoever. Typical. Yes it can, as it is simply energy out divided by energy in crackpot. But you have no clue how to measure energy crackpot. <snip delusional raving unread>