Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <c932a0dabd6ef1285bc553269e2d61b7d9eabc2b@i2pn2.org>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<c932a0dabd6ef1285bc553269e2d61b7d9eabc2b@i2pn2.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the
 semantics of the x86 language
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 11:05:16 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <c932a0dabd6ef1285bc553269e2d61b7d9eabc2b@i2pn2.org>
References: <v5pbjf$55h$1@dont-email.me> <v5r5q9$ekvf$1@dont-email.me>
	<v5s40h$jvgt$1@dont-email.me> <v5sbpt$1kfbr$2@i2pn2.org>
	<v5sjsa$msl0$1@dont-email.me> <v5skc9$1kfbr$7@i2pn2.org>
	<v5smuk$n7a2$1@dont-email.me> <v5sorr$1kfbr$10@i2pn2.org>
	<v5sp4v$nnko$1@dont-email.me> <v5sr4t$1kfbq$1@i2pn2.org>
	<v5srjn$o1o0$1@dont-email.me> <v5ssaq$1kfbq$2@i2pn2.org>
	<v5st66$o7ss$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 11:05:16 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2114256"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2011
Lines: 18

Am Sun, 30 Jun 2024 19:27:50 -0500 schrieb olcott:
> On 6/30/2024 7:13 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 6/30/24 8:00 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>
>>> THIS SEQUENCE CANNOT POSSIBLY RETURN WHY PERSISTENTLY LIE ABOUT IT?
>>>
>> But it does, just after H gives up its simulation.
>> You have even show that with a simulation.

>   DDD correctly emulated by HHH calls an emulated HHH(DDD)
> that emulates its own DDD that calls an emulated HHH(DDD)
> that is either aborted at some point never returning or hits
> out-of-memory error never returning
Running out of memory is only a physical constraint of no concern
to the theoretical behaviour.

-- 
Am Fri, 28 Jun 2024 16:52:17 -0500 schrieb olcott:
Objectively I am a genius.