Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<c932a0dabd6ef1285bc553269e2d61b7d9eabc2b@i2pn2.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: joes <noreply@example.org> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 11:05:16 -0000 (UTC) Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <c932a0dabd6ef1285bc553269e2d61b7d9eabc2b@i2pn2.org> References: <v5pbjf$55h$1@dont-email.me> <v5r5q9$ekvf$1@dont-email.me> <v5s40h$jvgt$1@dont-email.me> <v5sbpt$1kfbr$2@i2pn2.org> <v5sjsa$msl0$1@dont-email.me> <v5skc9$1kfbr$7@i2pn2.org> <v5smuk$n7a2$1@dont-email.me> <v5sorr$1kfbr$10@i2pn2.org> <v5sp4v$nnko$1@dont-email.me> <v5sr4t$1kfbq$1@i2pn2.org> <v5srjn$o1o0$1@dont-email.me> <v5ssaq$1kfbq$2@i2pn2.org> <v5st66$o7ss$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 11:05:16 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="2114256"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM"; User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Bytes: 2011 Lines: 18 Am Sun, 30 Jun 2024 19:27:50 -0500 schrieb olcott: > On 6/30/2024 7:13 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 6/30/24 8:00 PM, olcott wrote: >>> >>> THIS SEQUENCE CANNOT POSSIBLY RETURN WHY PERSISTENTLY LIE ABOUT IT? >>> >> But it does, just after H gives up its simulation. >> You have even show that with a simulation. > DDD correctly emulated by HHH calls an emulated HHH(DDD) > that emulates its own DDD that calls an emulated HHH(DDD) > that is either aborted at some point never returning or hits > out-of-memory error never returning Running out of memory is only a physical constraint of no concern to the theoretical behaviour. -- Am Fri, 28 Jun 2024 16:52:17 -0500 schrieb olcott: Objectively I am a genius.