Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <cFssoWICt8uSPUUyhAvSEgL5kHI@jntp>
JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Relativistic aberration
References: <QsysQnpetTSlB_zDsjAhnCKqnbg@jntp> <lgtntqFjg34U1@mid.individual.net> <v8cgia$1e4s9$1@dont-email.me>
 <O-L1WgU1eCsz14Wrc6D7tpNPV7s@jntp> <v8fkn6$23nee$1@dont-email.me> <FS7BRIsxO-_X20VxXPebSsjPIt4@jntp>
 <v8fudi$256gf$2@dont-email.me> <lh1o0aF7oiiU1@mid.individual.net>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: WfofoKauqx7PPYnJGf3wkaPqAms
JNTP-ThreadID: XgGFOrcTXd5ZDEX07aa-LTy0U04
JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=cFssoWICt8uSPUUyhAvSEgL5kHI@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a
JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 24 17:31:57 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/127.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-08-01T17:31:57Z/8972019"; posting-account="4@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr>
Bytes: 2855
Lines: 30

Le 01/08/2024 à 17:30, Athel Cornish-Bowden a écrit :
> On 2024-08-01 12:17:54 +0000, Python said:

>> The uninformed opinion of a demented egomaniac country doctor is of no
>> interest.
> 
> You mentioned the other day that "Dr" Hachel had been spouting his 
> ill-informed claptrap at fr.sci.physique for 30 years. So I had a look 
> there and saw that we are lucky at sci.physics.relativity, as we get 
> off fairly lightly.

No, I say the same things here as there.
And there as here, I never receive an obvious contradiction.
Saying: "Doctor Hachel, your posts are crap, because you don't describe 
relativistic geometry in the same way as Minlowski", is not an informed 
contradiction.
It's just saying "you don't think like him", there, precisely, the 
greatest physicists and philosophers in the world ask to think 
differently.
So I expect you to demonstrate that the good Doctor Hachel is wrong.
But you have to show where.
When I say that the excellent Paul B. Andersen is wrong, I show where and 
I explain why.
When I say that Python says anything during a Langevin at apparent speed, 
I show where and I explain why.
When I say that physicists give incorrect equations when evolving 
relativistic rotating frames or when studying uniformly accelerated 
frames, I show where, and I explain why.
I agree that such a man is annoying.

R.H.