Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <cGLopKEv1S9qR2nNCvaF8IqKf-s@jntp>
JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Langevin's paradox again
References: <FER4K03RCuXsBiIlfVNSgR0vilQ@jntp> <v6v2l5$3pri7$1@dont-email.me> <LS4aWQk6smoI8nPu6CSU96H5gYQ@jntp>
 <v710l9$7u9s$1@dont-email.me> <h2wfltG60Qx3kQd2ONdS3W4MJKs@jntp> <v71c86$a0te$1@dont-email.me>
 <fCidXYmBeggYm31OO1-5v64V0S8@jntp> <v736bn$mo0c$1@dont-email.me> <yX3K1wOobcIp1KzCuRuRL0Htcvg@jntp>
 <v73otr$ptku$1@dont-email.me>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: rDE9JGPSa_zy6ygKXMgzAKZD3NU
JNTP-ThreadID: sxhQQgyUgiiv6OcO_6O_beeL7bk
JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=cGLopKEv1S9qR2nNCvaF8IqKf-s@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a
JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 24 19:38:15 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/126.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-07-15T19:38:15Z/8949861"; posting-account="4@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr>
Bytes: 3195
Lines: 31

Le 15/07/2024 à 20:14, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit :
> 
> I can only give you the answer according to SR.
> You will find all the equations and the method to
> solve the problem here:
> https://paulba.no/pdf/TwinsByMetric.pdf

 Lots of interesting things, but a lot of things repeated from what 
relativists say, and which is not a personal thought.
This is all very interesting but it is difficult to have an honest and 
coherent discussion on this for several reasons.
The first being that the position of the relativists is today a matter of 
dogma, almost in the same way as Christian or Muslim dogmas. I agree on 
some things (I'm not a crank who denies everything), but I disagree on 
others.
It is very difficult today to attack the SR, even partially, even with 
enormous arguments. SR has apparently become more of a faith than a 
science, and this is not normal.
It becomes almost impossible to correct errors that are however clear, 
even if only in the correct explanation of Langevin. The SR is totally 
incoherent in the face of Hachel who will protest by saying that the 
apparent speeds are contradictory if we do not apply the notion of 
reciprocity of relativistic effects on lengths AND DISTANCES, which will 
explain why OBSERVABLE speeds instantaneous are incorrect, and why the use 
of real speeds brings a lot of understanding to the whole, which will also 
explain that the metric of rotating frames of reference is abstract and 
completely false.
But I repeat it clearly, the problem is human, and even in the face of 
theoretical evidence, humans will still say "it is impossible that I am 
wrong".

R.H.