| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<cS9mPpjgPYis2jIPjfNBHU_99tw@jntp> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp Message-ID: <cS9mPpjgPYis2jIPjfNBHU_99tw@jntp> JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net JNTP-DataType: Article Subject: Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX, References: <dad338831baa98f3eb1ca50452fd9401@www.novabbs.com> <vc7ehc$2bg7g$1@dont-email.me> <3d19aab5cf2bc8c14868ced3d0dda88c@www.novabbs.com> <02841f8e2b10ab216f462f52165399c1@www.novabbs.com> <d2fe4505066151ec83cc8e06b8def6f4@www.novabbs.com> <XbC5Qu49_RUWjjFOyZdz8vEqTRo@jntp> <w19rV2lulodsexk_EJwR8Y6actc@jntp> <KeMng-htXJYDukgVPkyAXjMEQpI@jntp> <pW0qpfhJOU9Jm-_-rywlUddJvKo@jntp> <6WUI_7naRSy-LU1S2Cp0-oKjjaw@jntp> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity JNTP-HashClient: 1XiAQ8B0N_qCr7VlSCkTUwi6CtI JNTP-ThreadID: dad338831baa98f3eb1ca50452fd9401@www.novabbs.com JNTP-ReferenceUserID: 190@nemoweb.net JNTP-Uri: https://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=cS9mPpjgPYis2jIPjfNBHU_99tw@jntp User-Agent: Nemo/1.0 JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net Date: Wed, 18 Sep 24 14:19:35 +0000 Organization: Nemoweb JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/128.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-09-18T14:19:35Z/9026915"; posting-account="4@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com" JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1 JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96 From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> Bytes: 2576 Lines: 21 Le 18/09/2024 à 00:13, Python a écrit : > > As expressed in the context that Dr. Lengrand didn't quote my article: > when both events are the starting/ending ones of a *full* inertial segment > the condition is not satisfied for the *full* return segment. > > On the other hand this condition *is true* for any "small enough" segment > either on both part of the round-trip. Again, this is explicitely written. > > I used to wonder if Hachel/Lengrand really missed the point, but given > how systematically he is ignoring *that very point* I started to wonder > if he's not just a fucking hypocrite. > > I think he is :-P > > Ignoring basic geometry is not a solution Richard... No more raving about Doppler effects. Tu délires Jean-Pierre, et ton arrogance idiote t'aveugle. R.H.