Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 15:57:16 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <cb6a625f1737dafed130e2bdad14395d95566ba1@i2pn2.org>
References: <vb4plc$2tqeg$1@dont-email.me> <vb6o5t$3a95s$1@dont-email.me>
	<vb71a3$3b4ub$4@dont-email.me> <vbbmuc$8nbb$1@dont-email.me>
	<vbcbe4$bdtb$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 15:57:16 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="961061"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2259
Lines: 30

Am Thu, 05 Sep 2024 08:24:20 -0500 schrieb olcott:
> On 9/5/2024 2:34 AM, Mikko wrote:
>> On 2024-09-03 13:00:50 +0000, olcott said:
>>> On 9/3/2024 5:25 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>> On 2024-09-02 16:38:03 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>
>>>>> A halt decider is a Turing machine that computes the mapping from
>>>>> its finite string input to the behavior that this finite string
>>>>> specifies.
>>>>
>>>> A halt decider needn't compute the full behaviour, only whether that
>>>> behaviour is finite or infinite.
>>>
>> Nice to see that you don't disagree with what said. Unvortunately I
>> can't agree with what you say.
>> HHH terminates, so DDD obviously terminates, too. No valid
>> C interpretaion of allows DDD to continue forever after HHH jas
>> terminated.
> DDD emulated by HHH never reaches it final halt state. It looks like I
> have to repeat this 10,000 times before anyone ever notices that I said
> it at least once.
We have noticed.

> Show the details of how DDD emulated by HHH reaches its own machine
> address 0000217f.
By HHH returning, which we are guaranteed from its definition as a
decider.

-- 
Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:
It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.