Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<cdd3666c57ec89aa553647c5c5fd69945d016e86@i2pn2.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: III correctly emulated by EEE --- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 07:04:30 -0400 Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <cdd3666c57ec89aa553647c5c5fd69945d016e86@i2pn2.org> References: <vrfuob$256og$1@dont-email.me> <vrmua7$cvat$8@dont-email.me> <dc633a07cd15e2c80ed98083cc5f9d218edcc9da@i2pn2.org> <vro0hk$1c9ia$1@dont-email.me> <9adf9b9c30250aaa2d3142509036c892db2b7096@i2pn2.org> <vrpfua$2qbhf$2@dont-email.me> <211f9a2a284cb2deaa666f424c1ef826fe855e80@i2pn2.org> <vrq330$3dq3n$1@dont-email.me> <e7268e8ef47579cacb49b0533d51549a77eb0b96@i2pn2.org> <vrqb6f$3k9kh$2@dont-email.me> <3f250e699762cfe6fccc844f10eb04f32d470b6a@i2pn2.org> <vrrpcl$11a56$4@dont-email.me> <8423998561d8feee807509b0ed6335123d35a7c9@i2pn2.org> <vru6in$38ob9$3@dont-email.me> <a81b9021e9b676c568d12f8e9fa9d27a0e7f4c07@i2pn2.org> <vrvs8b$p4vd$1@dont-email.me> <b4513778f4d273817c0b3f5bf20955e6e23aab0f@i2pn2.org> <vs20o1$2ot1m$2@dont-email.me> <803bd062b0eb7345e153adbb3b76eea1a0307a18@i2pn2.org> <vs29v1$31ibk$2@dont-email.me> <1fe49b2f2605ae8ab4e3127ad89e19952004e7de@i2pn2.org> <vs2dlm$354gv$1@dont-email.me> <b6e8903b39920fc927156a241708075095241088@i2pn2.org> <vs2iq3$38lvq$4@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 11:04:44 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="1963156"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg"; User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 In-Reply-To: <vs2iq3$38lvq$4@dont-email.me> Bytes: 3547 Lines: 51 On 3/27/25 12:05 AM, olcott wrote: > On 3/26/2025 10:30 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 3/26/25 10:37 PM, olcott wrote: >>> On 3/26/2025 9:28 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>> On 3/26/25 9:34 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>> On 3/26/2025 8:22 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>> On 3/26/25 6:57 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>> On 3/26/2025 6:24 AM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Since none of your EEE shows the actual behavior of the input, >>>>>>>> and we can show that since EEE will ALWAYS return after a finite >>>>>>>> number of steps >>>>>>> >>>>>>> III emulated by EEE never reaches its final halt state. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Only because EEE doesn't do a complete emulation. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> How is an infinite number of steps not a complete emulation? >>>>> >>>> >>>> You EEE never did an infinite numbdr of steps. >>>> >>> >>> Because you continue to dishonestly dodge the point I >>> have to revise the point to shut down your dishonest dodge. >>> >>> How is an infinite number of steps not a complete emulation? >>> >> >> Because you defined EEE to do a finite number of steps? >> > > I just redefined it to be infinite dipshit. Glad you are admitting that you "logic" is just "infinite dipshit". That is how all your logic works, you can't hold yourself to a single definition, because you logic just can't work. Sorry, you are proving that you are nothing but a pathological liar, and that all your work is just a FRAUD. > >> How is a finite number of steps ever infinite? >> >> You just are proving you don't understand the meaning of the words you >> use. > >