Article <ce78c27ef8c5af253d8f297b1529d68e@www.novabbs.org>

Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <ce78c27ef8c5af253d8f297b1529d68e@www.novabbs.org>

Deutsch English Français Italiano

<ce78c27ef8c5af253d8f297b1529d68e@www.novabbs.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: My 66000 and High word facility
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 18:04:08 +0000
Organization: Rocksolid Light
Message-ID: <ce78c27ef8c5af253d8f297b1529d68e@www.novabbs.org>
References: <v98asi$rulo$1@dont-email.me> <38055f09c5d32ab77b9e3f1c7b979fb4@www.novabbs.org> <v991kh$vu8g$1@dont-email.me> <2024Aug11.163333@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <8a7fbffe53e5b09ebac78a17b690d744@www.novabbs.org> <2024Aug15.104530@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <20240815170548.00006746@yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2690715"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="65wTazMNTleAJDh/pRqmKE7ADni/0wesT78+pyiDW8A";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$MnzD/IiZ0rtBvsMYIdzfceuiGOrrcp73KySn0qO4czvu5hMqCmFO.
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: ac58ceb75ea22753186dae54d967fed894c3dce8
Bytes: 1860
Lines: 16

On Thu, 15 Aug 2024 14:05:48 +0000, Michael S wrote:

> On Thu, 15 Aug 2024 08:45:30 GMT
> anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) wrote:
>
>> mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) writes:
>
> Was not Mitch himself involved in design of hyperSPARC that eventually
> reached very respectable clock frequency?

We got HyperSPARC up to 200 MHz and had a 250 MHz version in debug.

This was 20%-25% slower that the competition on the "average" SPARC
workload, but for some reason the "wall street traders" bought ship-
loads of them as they were somewhat faster than SuperSPARC or
UltraSPARC on that kind of workload--where milliseconds faster
means millions of dollars.