Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Einstein FRAUD with the paper on =?UTF-8?B?bT1FL2NeMg==?=
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 21:37:43 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <cf02bc06d7bce816c019f948b0992c05@www.novabbs.com>
References: <b63aec6ac23c5f03f785a3b342122e74@www.novabbs.com> <4ea16e676a4b3e0c07ccd3398bab88df@www.novabbs.com> <a17b682f09f29377d8560d8dc8b537e1@www.novabbs.com> <dee1e5b8e4bf14bf25f0b5153e8ff772@www.novabbs.com> <73d32b5141837dc59561b4fd054fd110@www.novabbs.com> <d848b328e5c395d1e18246e2ad667b7e@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3785415"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="HcQFdl4zp4UQRQ9N18ivMn6Fl9V8n4SPkK4oZHLgYdQ";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$hD3uQkae3yI3RukGnoodee42HeIbtTa.aQk0VaGhXbHPNjxr97mt6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: a2f761a7401f13abeefca3440f16b2f27b708180
Bytes: 3109
Lines: 51

On Sun, 9 Mar 2025 22:58:23 +0000, rhertz wrote:

> On Sun, 9 Mar 2025 22:26:34 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 9 Mar 2025 22:10:45 +0000, rhertz wrote:
>>
>>> I'm living at Buenos Aires, almost 650 Km far away from Bahia Blanca.
>>> Damages are mostly in houses. More than 1,000 million USD (estimated)
>>> for reconstruction.
>>>
>>> Many lives lost, but far less than in Valencia (Spain).
>>>
>>> Thanks for your wishes.
>> Mass-velocity relation:
>> According to this kinetic energy imparts mass. Kinetic energy is energy
>> that has no mass and imparts on mass. The relation is an unwarranted
>> inference from experiments.
>
> In times of Newton, what existed to define "capability of action" was
> what was called "vis viva", which was the modern concept of linear
> momentum.
>
> Newton's 2nd. Law introduced the concept of force as the "rate of change
> of
> momentum", which became F = d/dt(mv) = ma.
>
> One century later, when the general concept of energy was discussed,
> linear kinetic energy was defined as the power embedded into any object
> in linear
> trajectory due to accumulation of speed of a given mass, starting from
> v=0.
>
> Then, the modern concept of KE emerged as KE = ∫ (mv) dv [0; v]
>
> The factor 1/2 is purely due to adoption of the result of the integral.
> No
> physical meaning. Only mathematical. In this way, linear momentum, KE
> and force
> were mathematically connected.
>
>
> linear momentum = d/dv(KE) = d/dv(1/2 mv^2)
>
> linear force = d/dt [d/dv(KE)] = m dv/dt = m a
>
>
> Nothing has changed for 300 years, even with the fucking relativity
> except for
> the unscrupulous use in particle physics.
The mass-velocity relation requires kinetic energy to add mass because
KE causes the velocity. Why in the world would kinetic energy add mass
when it has none?