Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of The Shit
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 11:24:52 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <cf4da5f0623e38e6ea143cc17baa3df8@www.novabbs.com>
References: <17ee15afea6b29a3$410850$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <b50bb10aa2dd5727a1bf8ff9bf88a049@www.novabbs.com> <17ee716d7c7bfd12$441950$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <5ac85e6c9332ca0bece0023f17f2f442@www.novabbs.com> <17ee8ec58ffd13c8$485658$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <c519bd5f0f4086da711ede104860ed8e@www.novabbs.com> <17eeb977c7724ff7$459327$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <694f454547a8e56961b6896086a119f8@www.novabbs.com> <17eede9524f9dfa3$533525$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <916be12c0817f8d3d361d8265d8c57d5@www.novabbs.com> <17eefed3289d061e$484574$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <9da205dae3661a1709fed8ec149b04d3@www.novabbs.com> <17ef02dd9f274dac$613242$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <6924ff328199394116710ac198f103e2@www.novabbs.com> <17ef2dc9521ac81e$518524$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3961888"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="p+/k+WRPC4XqxRx3JUZcWF5fRnK/u/hzv6aL21GRPZM";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$uSnyYstMPt1G.859GiCxgeWXfdcu9uKIuw2Ok9.B93M6Zr3OveRM6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 47dad9ee83da8658a9a980eb24d2d25075d9b155
Bytes: 4773
Lines: 83

On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 4:45:24 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
> W dniu 26.08.2024 o 04:56, gharnagel pisze:
> >
> > On Sun, 25 Aug 2024 15:38:53 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> > >
> > > So, the physics of your idiot guru had no definition
> > > of second? Will you be impudent enough for such
> > > an absurd lie, trash?
> >
> > Theoretical physicists don't define seconds.
>
> So, the physics of your idiot guru had no definition
> of second? Will you be impudent enough for such
> an absurd lie, trash?
> Just stop dodging and changing  the subject.

Repeating falsehoods don't make them true.

> > > I apply the inconsistent assumptions of the physics
> > > of your idiot guru and derive 2 denying
> > > themself predictions. I can do it, because
> > > the mumble of your idiot guru was not even
> > > consistent.
> >
>> Wozniak is daydreaming. He has assumed his conclusion
> > based on Newtonian time assumption
>
> Harmagel is lying, as expected from a
> relativistic piece of shit.

Wozniak is projecting his own dishonesty, and insulting
and slandering, which he also projects.

> I apply the definition of second valid in his moronic
> physics (the whole of it, including The Shit of his
> idiot guru) up to 1960-ies.

Wozniak is in denial of reality.  His assertion is
misguided, dead wrong because he is basing it on
Newtonian (universal) time which is soundly refuted
by all experimental evidence:

https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/experiments.html

https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2010/09/nist-pair-aluminum-atomic-clocks-reveal-einsteins-relativity-personal-scale

https://www.nature.com/articles/nature.2014.15970

"Experiments at a particle accelerator in Germany confirm
that time moves slower for a moving clock than for a
stationary one."

Thus, relativity's prediction accurately matches what
happens in the real world.  Wozniak's vapid assertion
is completely refuted.

The definition of an earth second or day is "valid" for
an observer moving at c/2?  The observer is not on earth
so a Mars day, a Venus day or a Jupiter days is more
valid than an earth day, so Wozniak's dogmatism is
revealed to be gross chicanery.

But still he insults, slanders and lies.

“To hate being wrong is to change your opinion when
you are proven wrong; whereas pride, even when proven
wrong, decides to go on being wrong.” ― Criss Jami

Tsk, tsk.  He must be betting that there is no God:

"But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable,
and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and
idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the
lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is
the second death." -- Revelation 21:8

That may not be a good wager:

“Granted that faith cannot be proved, what harm will
come to you if you gamble on its truth and it proves
false?  If you gain, you gain all; if you lose, you
lose nothing.  Wager, then, without hesitation, that
He exists.” – Blaise Pascal