Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Kicking the straw-man deception
 out on its ass
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2025 22:46:31 -0500
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <cf64074c718d487c7610a4cca877b88d953452f5@i2pn2.org>
References: <vq2i40$ug75$3@dont-email.me>
 <aff6ceb585b4f024c238d901362389163051aac8@i2pn2.org>
 <vq2jpi$ug75$4@dont-email.me>
 <a5881effb7ea9a41f6e94ad6262ccd48d9e09cf3@i2pn2.org>
 <vq33oq$11qv8$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 03:46:32 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2590635"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
In-Reply-To: <vq33oq$11qv8$1@dont-email.me>

On 3/2/25 9:22 PM, olcott wrote:
> On 3/2/2025 6:42 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 3/2/25 4:49 PM, olcott wrote:
>>> On 3/2/2025 3:29 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>> On 3/2/25 4:21 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>> int DD()
>>>>> {
>>>>>    int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
>>>>>    if (Halt_Status)
>>>>>      HERE: goto HERE;
>>>>>    return Halt_Status;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> _DD()
>>>>> [00002133] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping
>>>>> [00002134] 8bec       mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping
>>>>> [00002136] 51         push ecx      ; make space for local
>>>>> [00002137] 6833210000 push 00002133 ; push DD
>>>>> [0000213c] e882f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH(DD)
>>>>> [00002141] 83c404     add esp,+04
>>>>> [00002144] 8945fc     mov [ebp-04],eax
>>>>> [00002147] 837dfc00   cmp dword [ebp-04],+00
>>>>> [0000214b] 7402       jz 0000214f
>>>>> [0000214d] ebfe       jmp 0000214d
>>>>> [0000214f] 8b45fc     mov eax,[ebp-04]
>>>>> [00002152] 8be5       mov esp,ebp
>>>>> [00002154] 5d         pop ebp
>>>>> [00002155] c3         ret
>>>>> Size in bytes:(0035) [00002155]
>>>>>
>>>>> DD emulated by HHH according to the behavior that DD
>>>>> specifies cannot possibly reach its own "ret" instruction
>>>>> and terminate normally.
>>>>
>>>> WHich only shows that HHH can not correctly emulate its input and 
>>>> give an answer.
>>>>
>>>
>>> The fact that HHH does correctly determine that DD
>>> emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own "ret"
>>> instruction and terminate normally proves that your
>>> claim is counter factual.
>>
>> You say that, but it isn't true, 
> 
> You keep trying to get away with saying that the
> fact that DD calls its own emulator in recursive
> emulation does not change the behavior from the
> behavior of the directly executed DD.
> 
> AT THIS POINT THAT BECOMES VERY STUPIDLY WRONG.
> SINCE WE KNOW THAT YOU ARE NOT THAT STUPID WHAT ELSE IS LEFT?
> 
> 

And you keep on making the claim without evidence!!!!


What instruction acted differently between the to, that was directly 
executied and correctly emulated to different results.

Your failure to specify this, just proves you are just a blantant and 
pathetic liar that knows he doesn't have any ground to stand on.

All you are doing is PROVING to the world that you live in the world of 
make-beleive where you think the Truth_Fairy is able to make you wishes 
come true, even though they are false.

Note, DD doesn't call "its own" emulator, it call the emulator/decider 
HHH, the one you claim gets the right answer, and thus is the one that 
aborts and returns 0.

Your attempts to make it something else just shows that you lie, and are 
so stupid you don't see the errors in your claims.